<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5459" />
  <endPage num="5518" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000045">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:32:48" />
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000046">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:32:48" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:32):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Police in relation to the nuclear waste dump.</text>
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000047">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="5461" />
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000048">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  Yesterday, the minister claimed that there had been bipartisan support for a nuclear waste dump in South Australia. I note the fact that the recent state ALP convention failed to endorse a nuclear waste dump. On Monday of this week, the SA Unions secretary labelled the Premier's nuclear referendum as 'a crazy or brave move from a tone-deaf leader'. I ask the minister: can the minister name a single political party in South Australia which is committed to pursuing a nuclear waste dump?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:33:29" />
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000049">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:33:29" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:33):</by>  I will answer the last question first. I thank the honourable member for his questions. There isn't currently a political party in the South Australian parliament that is actively supporting the pursuit of a nuclear waste dump, simply because the Liberal Party—the opposition—killed it. They killed an opportunity in this state to have a decent, well thought through, thorough debate—a thorough debate. This party of government is committed to a decent, thorough, consultative debate with the South Australian public, provided it has bipartisan support.</text>
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000050">The concept of having a decent discussion within the community is something that we relish. We like the idea of that, provided that it has bipartisan support. At the first test of political conviction, the opposition and the Leader of the Opposition have failed that test. They have failed to give the South Australian people an opportunity to have a decent discussion and thorough political debate about a potential opportunity for the state.</text>
        <text id="2016111630ddf740d5804ba980000051">I have to say that the Leader of the Opposition and all of his backbench colleagues, who have abandoned principle and conviction at the first opportunity, have broken the hearts of so many South Australians who actually like the idea of having a leader who is open to having a public consultation and a debate. It is an appalling representation on a whole range of applicants who aspire to higher office. They can't and aren't willing to hear the South Australian public's views because they have killed it at the first opportunity. Shame on them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>