<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5459" />
  <endPage num="5518" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000036">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000037">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:30:17" />
        <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000038">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:30:17" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:30):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation. Given the significant objections of Aboriginal communities across South Australia to the use of their sacred lands to store nuclear waste, does the minister support the establishment of a nuclear waste dump in South Australia, as being pursued by the Premier?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:30:35" />
        <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000039">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:30:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (14:30):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question in relation to Aboriginal communities' views. I absolutely and completely support the Premier's statement that if ever this was to be pursued, local Aboriginal communities would have a right of veto over any such proposal. I think that is the correct and the right thing to do. Certainly, it is something that I think accords with the views of Aboriginal communities that I have visited.</text>
        <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000040">Over the last week, I think I have travelled about 5,000 kilometres visiting Aboriginal communities, including Pipalyatjara, Kalka, Nyapari, Amata, Umuwa, Pukatja, Mimili, Kaltjiti, Iwantja, Kenmore Park, Shirley Well, Amuroona and Railway Bore, and that is something that is quite clear, that they want to be involved in the decisions that affect them. So, having a right of veto I think is absolutely the right thing to do.</text>
        <text id="201611161481e2b7123149f6b0000041">The weekend before my recent trip to the APY lands, I spent on the Far West Coast, in Ceduna, Scotdesco and Yalata. The weekend before that, I was in Adnyamathanha country at Iga Warta, talking to the Nepabunna and Copley communities as well, and the week before that in the South-East, particularly Camp Coorong, with the Ngarrindjeri Regional Authority. The message I get is that Aboriginal communities and Aboriginal people want to be involved in the decisions that affect them, so I absolutely support the Premier's statement that if this ever progressed, which would require at first instance a bipartisan approach, local Aboriginal communities would have a right of veto.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>