<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5459" />
  <endPage num="5518" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000158">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T15:08:15" />
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000159">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T15:08:15" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:08):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before addressing a question to the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation on how many times Aboriginal communities will have to say no.</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000160">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000161">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  As members are well aware, the recent report of the South Australian citizens' jury, the second citizens' jury on nuclear waste, in its final report considered under what circumstances, if any, South Australia could pursue the opportunity to store and dispose of nuclear waste from other countries. I refer the minister to the note in regard to Aboriginal consent within that final citizens' jury report that said that 'the majority of Aboriginal communities have already said no and the government needs to respect that.'</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000162">That report notes that 32 communities have specifically said no. The minister, of course, also has the option to talk to the Co-Commissioners for Aboriginal Engagement, and I certainly would be interested to hear what they have had to say on the issue. I ask the minister:</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000163">1.&amp;#x9;Has he consulted with the Co-Commissioners for Aboriginal Engagement on the issue of a high-level nuclear waste dump, and what have they said?</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000164">2.&amp;#x9;Has he written and assured those 32 communities that have already said no, that they will not have their voice ignored and that their no will be heard loud and clear, or will they, like Warriena Wright to Gable Tostee, have to say it 33 times in this state?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T15:09:48" />
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000165">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T15:09:48" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:09):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her questions. I have spoken to many, many Aboriginal individuals and people representing various Aboriginal communities on many topics, including their views on the nuclear industry in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000166">I think it is a mistake if one takes an Aboriginal view as an homogenous statewide opinion, that there is an Aboriginal view on issues. I think that fundamentally misunderstands Aboriginal people and the nature of Aboriginal communities, that you could try to say this is the Aboriginal view, no more than you could say that this is the view of all South Australians. I just don't think it's fair and I think it completely misunderstands it to say that there is one single view.</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000167">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000168">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  I appreciate the interjections. I hope the interjections are coming from a place of ignorance, not mild racism in thinking that there is one particular view on this.</text>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000169">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000170">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! The interjections should come from nowhere.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611166dd36d1ea1324fbd90000171">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Certainly I think it's the right thing to do, to give local Aboriginal communities a right of veto, to say no, and that's what has happened.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>