<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5401" />
  <endPage num="5457" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Wildlife Ethics Committee</name>
      <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000309">
        <heading>Wildlife Ethics Committee</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Wildlife Ethics Committee</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:26:05" />
        <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000310">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:26:05" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (15:26):</by>  Supplementary: I invite the minister to consider whether he is concerned by the number of endangered species that have been killed through these experiments, as reported to the Wildlife Ethics Committee?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Wildlife Ethics Committee</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:26:17" />
        <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000311">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:26:17" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (15:26):</by>  As I say, I am not aware of any particulars the Hon. Ms Franks might be referring to. Whether they are using endangered animals, that would surprise me.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. Franks</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000312">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. Franks:</by>  You would be surprised.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000313">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  Well, there may be real reasons for that. In fact, if you are dealing with research into, for example, the facial tumours that affect Tasmanian devils, then you may well be experimenting on native animals and endangered species, but that is to actually improve the outcomes for those species. However, in most medical research and models you use animals that have some translation to the human sphere so that you can be convinced that any intervention you take on an animal has some replicability in terms of human models. That has been built up over many years in terms of rats, pigs and other animals that are used in research that is aimed at medical research for human conditions.</text>
        <page num="5418" />
        <text id="201611155a2cfc09ae2c445eb0000314">Again, I will look into that and consider whether that is an issue, but as I say, you would expect there to be research on native animals if the point of the research is to actually protect those native animals and arrive at cures, as, for example, in terms of the Tasmanian devil.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>