<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-11-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5335" />
  <endPage num="5399" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000250">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>National Parks</name>
      <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000251">
        <heading>National Parks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-03">
            <name>National Parks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-03T14:20:05" />
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000252">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-03T14:20:05" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:20):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before directing a question to the Minister for Environment on the subject of national parks.</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000253">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000254">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  I have been contacted by a constituent who is concerned that the camping part of the permit system has been suddenly changed without much advice from the department. This constituent is concerned that this is going to be a new way of the department revenue raising, particularly for those people who regularly like to use the camping facilities, who can no longer purchase their camping pass as part of their (in his case) annual parking pass, but they are also no longer available as a package with other passes, such as a hiker/cyclist pass or the holiday park pass. As reported in the <term>Port Lincoln Times</term>:</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000255">
          <inserted>The department's Parks and Partnerships program manager Chris Thomas said the changes were part of the state government's aim to make South Australia a 'world-leader in nature-based tourism'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000256">He goes on to say:</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000257">
          <inserted>As part of this, we are looking at ways of increasing the number of people visiting parks, including reviewing and possibly even abolishing park entry fees where possible.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="5354" />
        <text continued="true" id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000258">To which my constituent expresses some scepticism. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000259">1.&amp;#x9;What individuals and groups did the department consult with prior to this change?</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000260">2.&amp;#x9;What is the anticipated impact of revenue as a result of changes to the camping system?</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000261">3.&amp;#x9;What exactly was Mr Thomas referring to when he was talking about 'abolishing park entry fees'? Can the minister outline those for us?</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000262">4.&amp;#x9;Does the government intend announcing and defending this prior to the very busy Christmas holiday period?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-11-03T14:22:08" />
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000263">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-03T14:22:08" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (14:22):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her very important questions. The South Australian government is seeking to bring more people into the state's national parks and reserves, as the Hon. Michelle Lensink confirmed, and this is in line with South Australia's nature-based tourism strategy. The government's park investments, including the $10.4 million investment made in metropolitan parks, have resulted in new walking trails, cycle tracks, picnic areas, car parks, playgrounds and other visitor facilities. In 2015, approximately 70 per cent of all South Australians indicated that they had visited a national park, I understand, which is up from 52 per cent in 2014.</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000264">Ultimately, access to parks should be made as simple as possible, and action 3.4 of the action plan is a commitment to review park entry fees. This change will streamline the current parks pass offering. An easier payment option has also been introduced through an online booking system, which is being rolled out across the state to allow people to book park entries, camp sites, tours and heritage accommodation in advance. Parks where online booking is already available are receiving increased visitation, including more family groups, I am advised.</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000265">Park fees collected go back into maintaining quality visitor facilities and services. I have mentioned in this place before that we have moved to an online booking system for camping bookings. This allows people to book their camping adventure from the comfort of their own home on their own private device, with the certainty that their favourite camping spot will be reserved and available when they arrive. I understand that it has met with a great deal of support and that in fact more camp sites are booked out than ever before, with the camper knowing that they can actually get the camp site that they prefer.</text>
        <text id="201611037de5bc44329f4410a0000266">Whilst we are going through a period of modernisation and using new technology to try to drive an increased visitor experience, I understand some people have fears about change. I am not one of them, but I am sure the Hon. Michelle Lensink, once she experiences these things for herself, will appreciate the benefits that can be brought into the system, the benefits to visitation and the benefits for local communities as well. I think that is to be wholly commended and supported.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>