<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-09-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4971" />
  <endPage num="4995" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Extreme Weather Conditions</name>
      <text id="20160929f50c9a68cba542f4b0000079">
        <heading>Extreme Weather Conditions</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-29">
            <name>Extreme Weather Conditions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-29T14:36:26" />
        <text id="20160929f50c9a68cba542f4b0000080">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-29T14:36:26" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:36):</by>  In relation to the use of Auslan interpreters, would the minister undertake to review the policy in relation to the use of Auslan interpreters, considering that, as I understand the minister's answer, he is distinguishing between a section 23 major emergency and a section 22 incident? If the events of recent days have been a major incident, it clearly can be a very significant event to which all South Australians are entitled to fair communication.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-29">
            <name>Extreme Weather Conditions</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-29T14:36:58" />
        <text id="20160929f50c9a68cba542f4b0000081">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-29T14:36:58" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:36):</by>  There will naturally be reviews in due course because this has been such a significant event. There is not currently any plan by me, but I am open to looking at this, as reviews ensue, about changing it. As it stands, there isn't any intention to do that because, by and large, I think all would agree, the system has worked in respect to Auslan interpreters. They have been present at every press conference that has been undertaken. The appropriate authorities have been exercising their discretion as is appropriate to ensure that they have been present and they have been. What I would say is that until such time that I am presented with evidence that the current system has not worked, I would not see any need to review that specific clause.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>