<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-07-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4567" />
  <endPage num="4604" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Rigney, Mr R.G.</name>
      <text id="2016072663e2a86aa1104291a0000165">
        <heading>Rigney, Mr R.G.</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4364" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.L. VINCENT</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-07-26">
            <name>Rigney, Mr R.G.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-07-26T14:53:13" />
        <text id="2016072663e2a86aa1104291a0000166">
          <timeStamp time="2016-07-26T14:53:13" />
          <by role="member" id="4364">The Hon. K.L. VINCENT (14:53):</by>  A supplementary question: exactly how complex is the process to receive a returning prisoner back into prison, and on average how long should it take to complete that process? Given that the minister concedes that Mr Rigney is technically unlawfully out of prison, will he face any consequences for being unlawfully out of prison, even though he has tried to turn himself back in, when he does return?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-07-26">
            <name>Rigney, Mr R.G.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-07-26T14:53:43" />
        <text id="2016072663e2a86aa1104291a0000167">
          <timeStamp time="2016-07-26T14:53:43" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:53):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question; it is a reasonable one to ask but it is not one I can answer. What punishment is issued by the courts to Mr Rigney for being unlawfully at large is a matter for the courts. I am not in a position to make that decision nor influence it.</text>
        <text id="2016072663e2a86aa1104291a0000168">Regarding the first part of the question on the complexity of admission of people into prison, it is complex. That might not be a logical position or a logical answer, but there is a whole range of processes and procedures that need to be complied with to ensure that DCS is holding prisoners in custody legally. There quite appropriately are a range of checks and balances in place to ensure that that is the case, and, of course, where you have a lot of detail to be able to get things right, that does bring with it complexity, particularly in this particular instance where the nature of the order issued by the court, I am advised, is very unusual.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>