<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-06-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4125" />
  <endPage num="4164" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Firearms Licences</name>
      <text id="20160607e3a906294d4d42d990000200">
        <heading>Firearms Licences</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-06-07">
            <name>Firearms Licences</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-06-07T14:57:24" />
        <text id="20160607e3a906294d4d42d990000201">
          <timeStamp time="2016-06-07T14:57:24" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (14:57):</by>  In respect of my first question, as I have said, I have been provided with times ranging from six to eight months to get a licence. Can you comment on that?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-06-07">
            <name>Firearms Licences</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-06-07T14:57:38" />
        <text id="20160607e3a906294d4d42d990000202">
          <timeStamp time="2016-06-07T14:57:38" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:57):</by>  Not being familiar with the specific circumstances that the Hon. Mr Darley is referring to, it is probably difficult for me to be able to make a specific comment. What I would say generally is that we would hope that all applications that are rudimentary are being dealt with in a manner that is efficient. I think one would reasonably expect a quicker time line than the one you have outlined, but not knowing the specific circumstances that you are referring to with respect to the application that you are referring to, it is difficult for me to make a comment.</text>
        <text id="20160607e3a906294d4d42d990000203">There is no attempt on behalf of the government to suggest that the system that has recently been in place is perfect; we acknowledge that there is work that needs to be done. We are not seeking to avoid scrutiny in that respect. We, as a government, and SAPOL are putting efforts in place to ensure that we can try to improve the process, as I have outlined, and that is something that we remain committed to. With respect to the Hon. Mr Darley's specific question, I am not in a position to answer it by virtue of the fact that it is in regard to a very specific application.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>