<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-05-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3981" />
  <endPage num="4026" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SA Water</name>
      <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000047">
        <heading>SA Water</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-24">
            <name>SA Water</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-24T14:27:25" />
        <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000048">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-24T14:27:25" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:27):</by>  I have a supplementary question arising from the answer in which the minister tried to imply that ESCOSA directs how SA Water expends its funds. I quote from an ESCOSA document—and can the minister reflect on his answer—where it states:</text>
        <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000049">
          <inserted>The expenditure benchmarks set by the Commission for the purpose of determining regulated revenues do not dictate the actual amount of expenditure that SA Water must incur or how SA Water should direct its expenditure. Rather, SA Water is responsible for managing its daily network operations and maintaining supply reliability and services to customers; it must decide appropriate expenditures to meet its obligations and to maintain the long-term integrity of its networks.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-24">
            <name>SA Water</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-24T14:28:05" />
        <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000050">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-24T14:28:05" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (14:28):</by>  And they sign off and say, 'That is a prudent amount of expenditure.' Here we are, the document that the Hon. Michelle Lensink supposedly supports the Liberal Party putting out, which talks about pipe network renewal for the 2015-16 budget and right above—and I seek leave to table this document which comes from the budget statement.</text>
        <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000051">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201605240ed05514acc74e9b80000052">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  What did they miss? They have missed the Hackney and North East Road trunk water main renewal March 2016, $13 million. They did not add that into their figures because it was not convenient. It did not fit the story they were trying to peddle, the story they were trying to con people with. So $13 million was completely missed by Mr Pisoni, the member for Unley, in the other place. Why? Because he has no clue about how to read budget papers.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>