<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3805" />
  <endPage num="3858" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cycling Regulations</name>
      <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000715">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Cycling Regulations</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-17">
            <name>Cycling Regulations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000716">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="3126">the Hon. D.G.E. HOOD </by>(14 October 2015).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-17">
            <name>Cycling Regulations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000717">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety):</by>  The Minister for Transport and Infrastructure has been provided with the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000718">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;The following is taken from the Regulatory Impact Statement, which is available on the website of the Department of the Premier and Cabinet:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000719">
          <inserted>'The Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) undertook public consultation on the legislative detail for the two proposals. The consultation process, which ran from 4 to 20 March 2015, generated 1,584 submissions from the general public and stakeholder organisations. Not all respondents commented on both proposals.'</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000720">
          <inserted>Both proposals were supported by a clear majority of respondents (over 70%).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000721">
          <inserted>The consultation process was promoted through: </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000722">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>DPTI media release issued on 3 March 2015.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000723">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Consultation with stakeholder organisations especially organisations representing the interests of people with disabilities. Submissions received included those from Blind Citizens Australia (Adelaide and National Branches), Council of the Ageing South Australia, Health South Australia, Heart Foundation, Royal Society for the Blind and Vision Australia. </inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000724">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>DPTI social media: I Bike I Like Facebook page, DPTI Facebook page and twitter account.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000725">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Email announcement to DPTI and SAGEMS addresses.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000726">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>SA Government YourSAy community engagement.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000727">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Disability SA—Disability Services Information Update, and Disability Register.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <page num="3852" />
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000728">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>National Heart Foundation online newsletter.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000729">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Bike SA social media.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000730">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Motor Accident Commission social media.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000731">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Amy Gillett Foundation social media.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000732">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Information provided at meeting of DPTI's Transport Accessibility Advisory Group.'</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000733">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;The Australian Road Rules treat riding on footpaths as the norm. Jurisdictions can ban it if they wish, which SA has partially done until now. Therefore, there already exists a framework for dealing with cyclists' behaviour on footpaths, such as keeping to the left, giving way to any pedestrian, enforcement and liability. Riding with due care has also been a common element along with the same requirement for drivers of motor vehicles.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000734">
          <inserted>For some time this framework has been applicable to cyclists under 12 and adults accompanying them, and people with a medical certificate permitting them to ride on the footpath. As with all other road users, cyclists will be required to ride with due care and attention under section 45 of the Road Traffic Act. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000735">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;The matter of compensation and insurance relies upon the common law. The current practice is that liability in the event of damage from collisions is dealt with as a civil matter. Many adult cyclists may already hold appropriate insurance through household cover policies. Other insurances are available through being members of sporting or cycling clubs.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000736">
          <inserted>A local council will not be liable unless the loss, damage or injury suffered by the pedestrian is attributable to the negligence of the council and the alleged negligence by the council does not fall within the 'highway immunity rule'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160517db6f0772efb844f0b0000737">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;'The changes have been put in place via regulation because they pertain to the Australian Road Rules. Matters pertaining to behaviour on the physical infrastructure properly belong in the Road Rules, as opposed to higher-level requirements such as drink and drug-driving, which belong in the Road Traffic Act. However, the minimum passing distance rules at least are not, at present, nationally consistent and therefore properly belong in SA's Ancillary and Miscellaneous Regulations, which contain state variations to the Road Rules. The changes regarding cycling on footpaths simply repeal the partial ban that is already a part of the Ancillary and Miscellaneous Regulations.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>