<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3805" />
  <endPage num="3858" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000251">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-17">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-17T15:19:08" />
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000252">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-17T15:19:08" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:19):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation a question about nuclear waste dumps on crown land.</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000253">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000254">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  On 29 April, the federal Minister for Energy, Resources and Northern Australia, Mr Josh Frydenburg, announced that the short list of six self-nominated sites for a commonwealth nuclear waste dump had been narrowed down to just one site, being at Barndioota in the Flinders Ranges in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000255">As members know, the land in question is crown land; it is under the Crown Land Management Act 2009 and is subject to a perpetual lease. As the minister knows, under the Crown Land Management Act, a lessee is not able to excise any part of the lease without the express permission of the minister, or to use any part of the lease for a nuclear waste dump without the minister's permission. In other words, leaving aside the legislative prohibition on nuclear waste dumps in this state found in the Nuclear Waste Storage Facility Prohibition Act 2000, there is the more fundamental issue that the ultimate fate of the land in question is squarely in the hands of the minister. There is only one site being considered, and that is crown land under the control of the minister.</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000256">No-one believes that the federal government would have put all its eggs in one basket unless it had some assurance that it had the support of the ultimate owner of the land as represented by the minister. My questions of the minister are:</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000257">1.&amp;#x9;What discussions has the minister or his department had with the federal government over a possible commonwealth nuclear waste dump at Barndioota in South Australia?</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000258">2.&amp;#x9;What assurances has the minister or his department given to the federal government?</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000259">3.&amp;#x9;Have any contracts, memoranda of understanding or other documents been prepared to reflect the state government's support for this nuclear waste dump, and will the minister share those documents with the South Australian public and this parliament?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-05-17T15:21:09" />
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000260">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-17T15:21:09" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (15:21):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions. He is quite right; I understand that the land he refers to that the federal government has shortlisted, along with other areas, is land that is held under a perpetual pastoral lease and as such is crown land. My understanding is that the federal legislation specifically contemplated that and made provision, either in the legislation—I cannot say—or in the regulatory approach that the federal government has taken to allow for leaseholders to nominate land to the federal government.</text>
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000261">That does not, of course, answer any of the questions the honourable member has about what role I might have as the manager of crown lands in terms of that matter, but, from the federal government's point of view, my understanding is that their procedure allowed leaseholders to directly nominate to them, putting aside what that might mean in terms of our own legislation.</text>
        <page num="3821" />
        <text id="201605179e664700f48c4b4ca0000262">In terms of any discussions that I have had with the federal government about this, I cannot recall that there have been any. I cannot recall immediately that there has been any written communication to me about this either. There may have been some officer level discussions. I will have to take that question on notice and bring back a response, but as far as I am aware there has been no federal government contact with me or my office in relation to any discussions about this or any approval process. Whilst there may have been officer to officer contact which I am not aware of, I will make those inquiries and bring back the answer to the member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>