<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3805" />
  <endPage num="3858" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Home Detention</name>
      <text id="201605175bb67a3481b440bea0000213">
        <heading>Home Detention</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-17">
            <name>Home Detention</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-17T15:05:48" />
        <text id="201605175bb67a3481b440bea0000214">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-17T15:05:48" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:05):</by>  Supplementary: I thank the minister for his answer. Can the minister confirm how many instances have been detected by Corrections of individuals apparently trying to tamper with their device using the alfoil, as exposed, if you like, on Channel 7 last night?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-17">
            <name>Home Detention</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-17T15:06:08" />
        <text id="201605175bb67a3481b440bea0000215">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-17T15:06:08" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (15:06):</by>  As I said and already committed to, I am happy to take that question on notice and get the specific information that you have asked back. I have already made inquiries in light of the report on <term>7 News</term> last night regarding this. I think the critical message that should be taken out of this is that the South Australian public does by and large remain safe and secure from those people who are on home detention.</text>
        <text id="201605175bb67a3481b440bea0000216">There are a range of technologies outside of the bracelet that are in place. DCS (Department for Correctional Services) already has in place a whole range of mechanisms to ensure that home detention orders are complied with that go beyond the anklet itself. Indeed, the unit that is responsible for monitoring home detention themselves do conduct random visits to people's homes to ensure that everything is in order.</text>
        <text id="201605175bb67a3481b440bea0000217">There are a whole range of checks and balances in place regarding home detention, and the public should have confidence that we are doing everything we can as a government to ensure that people who are on home detention do indeed comply with those orders and remain at home and out of harm's way. In regard to the specifics, those questions have already been raised, and again, I am more than happy to bring that information to the light of the public more broadly through this chamber as it comes to hand.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>