<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-04-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3751" />
  <endPage num="3803" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sampson Flat Bushfire</name>
      <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000834">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Sampson Flat Bushfire</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-04-14">
            <name>Sampson Flat Bushfire</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000835">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="3164">the Hon. S.G. WADE </by>(23 February 2016).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-04-14">
            <name>Sampson Flat Bushfire</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000836">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="5084">The Hon. P. MALINAUSKAS (Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety):</by>  The South Australian Country Fire Service (CFS) has advised the following in regards to the Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council's independent operational review (AFAC review):</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000837">
          <inserted>Recommendation 8—'The CFS conduct a review of SIMT with a view to increasing the number of teams from four to six, aligning them with each of the six regions within South Australia.'</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000838">
          <inserted>This recommendation was noted but not accepted. The CFS has advised that this recommendation is not sustainable within the South Australian context due to the relatively small size of the fire and emergency services sector in South Australia.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000839">
          <inserted>I am advised by the CFS the four teams currently used are sufficient for most normal fire seasons in South Australia. Increasing the number of teams from four to six will take resources away from other functions required to manage large, complex or long duration incidents.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="3803" />
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000840">
          <inserted>Recommendation 18 – 'Review relevant legislation, associated Acts and Plans to establish a consistent approach to fire and emergency management to minimise duplication and risk of contradiction. That the Hazard and Functional area plans be amalgamated and establish a South Australian Bushfire Plan, under the State Emergency Management Plan, which clearly define the role of the CFS.'</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20160414141d447584784826b0000841">
          <inserted>I am advised that the CFS has noted recommendation 18 of the AFAC review. The recommendation relates to the fact that there are requirements for a Bushfire Management Plan in the <term>Fire and Emergency Services Act 2005</term> and a Hazard Plan (fire) in the <term>Emergency Management Act 2004</term>, and questions why there are two separate plans. I am further advised the CFS is currently working towards amalgamating these into a single plan covering the requirements of both acts.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>