<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2016-02-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2853" />
  <endPage num="2897" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000206">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
      <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000207">
        <heading>Goods and Services Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-09">
            <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-09T15:19:50" />
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000208">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-09T15:19:50" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (15:19):</by>  My question is to the Leader of the Government and Minister for Employment: do you support the Premier's policy of increasing the GST rate to 15 per cent?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-09">
            <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-09T15:19:17" />
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000209">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-09T15:19:17" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Minister for Employment, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Minister for Manufacturing and Innovation, Minister for Automotive Transformation, Minister for Science and Information Economy) (15:19):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question about the GST. The answer is that all issues of commonwealth-state relations are a matter for the Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000210">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  Yes or no?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000211">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  However, before I was so rudely interrupted by the ever eager Leader of the Opposition pro tem—</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000212">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000213">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! Let the honourable minister answer the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000214">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  As the Premier has quite rightly pointed out, we need a mature national conversation about taxation and about how the future of the health and education system of the country will be funded. I am 100 per cent behind the Premier's position.</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000215">The federal Liberal Party have made $80 billion worth of cuts to schools and hospitals. This is the federal Liberal Party that went to the last federal election: 'No cuts to health, no cuts to education.' They could not have been clearer. In their first budget, they put it up there in writing. They were proud of it: $80 billion worth of cuts to health and education.</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000216">The Premier has come up with one possible idea to make sure that there is sustainable funding for health and education into the future. I note that the Liberal Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has been in the media in the last few days suggesting it might be a good idea for state governments to look at increasing land tax and payroll tax. This is the Liberal federal Prime Minister. On 5 February this year, Prime Minister Turnbull said on FIVEaa:</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000217">
          <inserted>[The states] have to be prepared, I believe, to go to their citizens and say, for example, we want to, we need to, raise money, more money to spend on our schools and hospitals and we are going to increase this state tax or that state tax.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="2863" />
        <text continued="true" id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000218">He went on to say:</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000219">
          <inserted>Well, you know, actually some of the most efficient tax bases in Australia are the [state based taxes] like land tax and payroll tax.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000220">He then said on the <term>Insiders </term>program a couple of days later that states should look at increasing payroll tax and land tax. I'm sure that the Hon. David Ridgway and his geniuses on the other side will completely support their federal leader and come in behind and want to raise state taxes—land tax and payroll tax. They've got some questions to answer that I think they just won't be prepared to. That's why they will say nothing.</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000221">They will keep with their genius small target strategy of 'say nothing, do nothing', the Rob Lucas strategy that has been so successful in the last election and so successful at the Fisher by-election. There's only one person coming up with ideas—and that is Jay Weatherill, the Premier, compared to Steven Marshall, who will say nothing, not support anything and think he can sail into office. That's not what we're going to do. We understand that as a state government we need to put ideas forward. That's what people expect.</text>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000222">They are not even close to being an alternative government. By definition, 'alternative' means having another point of view or having some sort of different competing possibilities. They don't have them. They have nothing at all. They are not even close to being an alternative government. They don't have their own policies and it's not good enough.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000223">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Supplementary, the Hon. Mr Ridgway.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. Stephens</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20160209f0ead5feb7c2467a80000224">
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. Stephens:</by>  How long did you rehearse that for, because it was rubbish!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>