<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1981" />
  <endPage num="2015" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Consumer and Business Services</name>
      <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000221">
        <heading>Consumer and Business Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4362" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.S. LEE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-29">
            <name>Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-29T15:06:16" />
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000222">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-29T15:06:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4362">The Hon. J.S. LEE (15:06):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Business Services and Consumers a question about Consumer and Business Services (CBS).</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000223">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4362" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.S. LEE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000224">
          <by role="member" id="4362">The Hon. J.S. LEE:</by>  Small businesses are doing it tough in South Australia and believe that they are getting no help from the government. My office has received a number of complaints about the Office of Consumer and Business Services. CBS is labelling South Australian businesses as 'dodgy' in their media releases. If a business is found guilty of an offence, using the term 'dodgy' would be deemed to be appropriate. However, I have been told by businesses that they suffer from the loss of business as well as their reputation being tarnished when labelled as 'dodgy' by a government agency even before a thorough investigation is completed.</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000225">For example, on 22 September 2015, the office of CBS released a media article titled 'Public Warning of Dodgy Dealings by Local Builder'. The document outlined the name of the tradesman along with his business name, stating:</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000226">
          <inserted>We strongly believe he is carrying on a business without holding the relevant South Australian Building Work Contractors licence.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000227">
          <item>Within the same document, however, it went on to say that 'CBS is continuing to investigate the alleged conduct'.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000228">
          <item>My questions to the minister are:</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000229">1.&amp;#x9;What mechanism has been put in place to monitor whether a small business is being unfairly treated by CBS, particularly when the investigation has not even been finalised?</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000230">2.&amp;#x9;What compensation measures will the minister put in place if CBS make the wrong judgement about a business under investigation?</text>
        <page num="1994" />
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000231">3.&amp;#x9;Will the minister review the CBS name and shame policy to ensure that business owners are given a fair and equitable hearing?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-10-29T15:08:10" />
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000232">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-29T15:08:10" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:08):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her important question. It's really easy for businesses to avoid being shamed and referred to as 'dodgy'. It's quite straightforward: it's in their hands. They've got complete control over this, complete autonomy, and they simply need to do the right thing.</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000233">These warnings that CBS have the power to authorise are only ever distributed when there is clear evidence that a breach has occurred, even though complete inquiries can take some time. I'm absolutely confident that CBS does not misuse that authority. The powers of the commissioner are fairly limited in a number of respects, but one thing that they are able to do successfully is to name and shame.</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000234">CBS are a group of extremely hardworking public servants who perform at an extremely high level. They operate in an incredibly business friendly way. When they are alerted to or become aware of any potential problems with a business, they always seek the most conservative remedy in the first instance. They seek to inform and assist businesses to understand their obligations, to put the right systems in place and to do the right thing, and it is usually only after a series of warnings and other interactions, when a business has failed to respond to the concerns raised by CBS, that they will take the next step and issue a warning or name a company publicly.</text>
        <text id="201510297b32267b7ae54b4f80000235">I am absolutely confident that if CBS has named a particular organisation, it is based on sound and solid evidence. As I said, if businesses want to avoid being named and shamed, it is in their hands; they simply need to do the right thing. If they are in doubt, as I said, CBS is there. They will offer all sorts of advice and assistance to help organisations and businesses here in South Australia do the right thing.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>