<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-10-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1701" />
  <endPage num="1750" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000709">
      <heading>Bills</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Long Service Leave (Calculation of Average Weekly Earnings) Amendment Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="r3822">
          <name>Long Service Leave (Calculation of Average Weekly Earnings) Amendment Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000710">
        <heading>Long Service Leave (Calculation of Average Weekly Earnings) Amendment Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Introduction and First Reading</name>
        <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000711">
          <heading>Introduction and First Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000712">Received from the House of Assembly and read a first time.</text>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000713">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
          <startTime time="2015-10-13T17:58:28" />
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000714">
            <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T17:58:28" />
            <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (17:58):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000715">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a second time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000716">I seek leave to have the second reading explanation inserted in <term>Hansard</term> without my reading it.</text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000717">Leave granted.</text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000718">
            <inserted>The Long Service Leave (Calculation of Average Weekly Earnings) Amendment Bill 2015 seeks to amend subsection 3(4)(a) and subsection 3(4)(b) of the <term>Long Service Leave Act 1987</term>. Subsection 3(4)(a) disregards whole weeks of unpaid leave from the calculation of long service leave payments for casual or part-time workers. Subsection 3(4)(b) stipulates that for the purposes of performing this calculation, the relevant periods when the worker was not at work due to work injury and in receipt of weekly payments will also be disregarded.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000719">
            <inserted>The intention of the amendments to subsection 3(4)(a) and subsection 3(4)(b) is to clarify that in addition to the unpaid leave exclusions, any week that a casual or part-time worker is absent from work for a work injury, is also excluded in the same manner.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000720">
            <inserted>The need for this clarity arises from a recent significant decision in the case of <term>Flinders Ports Pty Ltd v Woolford</term>, which was heard by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000721">
            <inserted>In this matter, a worker’s long service leave payment was reduced to almost nothing as a result of the Full Court of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of ‘unpaid leave’ for the purpose of calculating a long service leave entitlement. The Full Court of the Supreme Court held that ‘unpaid leave’ does not include the absence of an employee from work due to a compensable injury.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000722">
            <inserted>The Bill aims to remedy the unsatisfactory consequences of the Flinders Ports decision for casual and part-time employees under the <term>Long Service Leave Act 1987.</term> If a casual or part-time employee is entitled to long service leave payments, they should not end up with a zero or minimal payment because they were injured while performing their work.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000723">
            <inserted>Further, a compelling argument for the Bill is that casual and part-time employees, as employees eligible for long service leave under the <term>Long Service Leave Act</term>, should have their long service leave payments protected in the same manner as full-time employees. Currently full-time workers who are absent from work because of a work-related injury do not have their payment in lieu of long service leave upon termination reduced under the <term>Long Service Leave Act</term>, as the averaging provision of subsection 3(2) does not apply to them.</inserted>
          </text>
          <page num="1746" />
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000724">
            <inserted>I commend the Bill to Members.</inserted>
          </text>
          <bookmark>Explanation of Clauses</bookmark>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000725">
            <inserted>
              <subheading>Explanation of Clauses</subheading>
            </inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000726">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 1—Preliminary</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000727">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Short title</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000728">
            <item>
              <inserted>2—Commencement</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000729">
            <item>
              <inserted>3—Amendment provisions</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000730">
            <inserted>These clauses are formal.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000731">
            <item>
              <inserted>Part 2—Amendment of <term>Long Service Leave Act 1987</term></inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000732">
            <item>
              <inserted>4—Amendment of section 3—Interpretation</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000733">
            <inserted>This clause amends section 3 to ensure that any week in which a worker is absent from work on account of a work injury (within the meaning of the <term>Return to Work Act 2014</term>) for which the worker received weekly payments under that Act or, before 1 July 2015, under the <term>Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986</term> is excluded from the calculation of averaging weekly earnings under subsection (2)(a) or the number of hours worked per week under subsection (2)(b).</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000734">
            <item>
              <inserted>Schedule 1—Transitional provision</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000735">
            <item>
              <inserted>1—Transitional provision</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000736">
            <inserted>This clause inserts a transitional provision to provide that the amendment effected to the <term>Long Service Leave Act 1987</term> by this Act applies in relation to any long service leave taken (or any payment made in lieu of long service leave) on or after the commencement of this Act (including so as to apply in relation to absences of a worker occurring before the commencement of this Act).</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="2015101329e688f2a2d9495b80000737">Debate adjourned on motion of Hon. D.W. Ridgway.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>