<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-10-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1701" />
  <endPage num="1750" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Concordia Development</name>
      <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000222">
        <heading>Concordia Development</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-13">
            <name>Concordia Development</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T15:01:32" />
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000223">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T15:01:32" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:01):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, representing the Minister for Planning, a question about urban growth at Concordia.</text>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000224">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000225">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  Under the government's 30-year plan, urban fringe development at Concordia near Gawler has been identified as a long-term urban growth area with development possible during the second half of the plan period, or in other words sometime after 2023 but prior to the year 2038. This land was historically outside the urban growth boundary for Adelaide, but was added during the 2007 expansion.</text>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000226">Despite the long-term horizons, residents of the Gawler area are now concerned at local rumours that development at Concordia is being fast tracked by the Department for Planning, Transport and Infrastructure. There is also evidence of developers buying up land in the region ahead of an imminent rezoning. Residents point out that Gawler already has two large developments underway that will double the size of the town. Other areas to the north of Adelaide have also been designated for large-scale residential growth, including at Angle Vale, Virginia, Two Wells and Buckland Park.</text>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000227">One residents' group, the Gawler Region Community Forum, is concerned that the process behind future urban expansion is secretive and that the community is generally unaware of what is going on. They claim that the residents of Gawler are not being consulted and they are being kept in the dark. This is causing considerable concern, because the government has recently committed to overhauling community engagement in planning as part of the review of state planning laws. My questions of the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000228">1.&amp;#x9;Is his department fast tracking urban development at Concordia? If so, at whose request is this being done? Is it the local councils or the property developers?</text>
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000229">2.&amp;#x9;Will the government investigate the desirability of removing Concordia from proposed urban expansion as part of its commitment to urban infill ahead of urban sprawl?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T15:03:37" />
        <text id="20151013cfc71bc5d6f94a31a0000230">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T15:03:37" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:03):</by>  I thank the member for his questions and will refer them to the Minister for Planning in another place and will bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>