<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-10-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1701" />
  <endPage num="1750" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Skills for All</name>
      <text id="2015101375cdd97cbb174c0180000197">
        <heading>Skills for All</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-13">
            <name>Skills for All</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T14:53:05" />
        <text id="2015101375cdd97cbb174c0180000198">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T14:53:05" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:53):</by>  Did the whole-of-government submission preclude TAFE SA from also making a standalone individual submission?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-13">
            <name>Skills for All</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-13T14:53:11" />
        <text id="2015101375cdd97cbb174c0180000199">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-13T14:53:11" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:53):</by>  Sorry? Did the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2015101375cdd97cbb174c0180000200">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —whole-of-government submission preclude TAFE SA from making an individual stand-alone submission?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2015101375cdd97cbb174c0180000201">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  The government made a decision that it would make a whole-of-government submission. I can't recall that we were prescriptive in what TAFE's position would be. I did make it very clear that there would be a whole-of-government response, not separate responses to the commission and they would be incorporated in one submission. Now, I have said that a thousand ways. TAFE participated in that willingly. As I said, they provided us with information that we considered and incorporated components into the submission, just as I said we derived information from a range of different parts of government where we did the same thing and incorporated one overall response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>