<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-06-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1055" />
  <endPage num="1081" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>WorkReady</name>
      <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000205">
        <heading>WorkReady</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-30">
            <name>WorkReady</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-30T14:42:51" />
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000206">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-30T14:42:51" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:42):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills a question about WorkReady.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000207">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  The minister has claimed both in the public domain and private meetings that in arriving at the WorkReady model there was extensive industry and RTO consultation relating to WorkReady funding allocations. My question for the minister is: can she provide the names of specific organisations, the representatives of each and the respective date that she met with RTOs and consulted them on funding relating to training in broadacre agriculture?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-06-30T14:43:32" />
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000208">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-30T14:43:32" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:43):</by>  As I have said in this place before, we undertook extensive consultation with—</text>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000209">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000210">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:  Order!</by> The minister has the floor.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000211">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  It's hysterical. As I said, extensive consultation took place, not only in terms of a series of meetings with major stakeholders, including major industry representatives and associations, but also, we invited submissions and received over 1,500 submissions. I can list all of those if the honourable member really wants but I think that's—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000212">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink:</by>  Yes, please.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000213">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I'm not happy to waste the time of my officials, but I will take that on notice and I will bring back the comprehensive list of the participants who contributed to that consultation in terms of providing us with submissions and also a list of the meetings that were had.</text>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000214">As I said, it was a comprehensive consultation. We had a subsidised training list of around 900. Feedback from the industry was quite clear that they believed it was far too many and it complicated the way we approach subsidised training. They indicated that there were many who were completely outdated and out of mode. Really, it was the industry who requested that that task be undertaken. So, we listened to the industry and, as I said, undertook a comprehensive industry consultation session that enabled us to arrive at the current subsidised training list.</text>
        <text id="20150630d904a8ec79044b3fa0000215">I have said in this place many times, and in public, that we've indicated the best fit possible from that extensive dialogue, but we will continue to listen to the industry. TASC will continue its dialogue. I have asked them to continue to engage with key industry stakeholders to ensure that we have that list right and to make any further changes that might be needed. So, it is a piece of work that is in progress and will remain in progress to ensure that we have the most up-to-date and industry relevant focus on subsidised training as possible.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>