<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="755" />
  <endPage num="797" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform</name>
      <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000176">
        <heading>National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-06-02">
            <name>National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-06-02T15:09:24" />
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000177">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-02T15:09:24" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (15:09):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills a question relating to skills job training.</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000178">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000179">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  The government's changes to skills training funding significantly reduce the openness and competitive nature of the training market. Under clause 6 of the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform, the Weatherill Labor government commits to, and I quote:</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000180">
          <inserted>c.&amp;#x9;encouraging responsiveness in training arrangements by facilitating the operation of a more open and competitive training market;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000181">
          <inserted>d.&amp;#x9;enabling public providers to operate effectively in an environment of greater competition…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000182">My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000183">1.&amp;#x9;Given that the government's changes to skills training significantly reduce openness and competition, is the Weatherill government now in breach of the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform?</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000184">2.&amp;#x9;Can the minister assure the council that the government's breach of the agreement will not lead to the loss of up to $65 million in commonwealth funding?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2015-06-02T15:10:31" />
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000185">
          <timeStamp time="2015-06-02T15:10:31" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:10):</by>  It is absolutely outrageous that Senator Simon Birmingham has threatened to in fact breach the federal government's commitment to the national partnership agreement. South Australia has complied with the national partnership agreement. We have met all our milestones and, what's more, we have exceeded most of those. We have been one of the leading jurisdictions in reforms to the VET sector.</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000186">I am absolutely confident that the WorkReady changes being proposed continue to comply with the national partnership agreement, so it's absolutely outrageous that the federal government would now seek to withhold those funds and breach their part in that agreement. They have made a unilateral agreement. They are clearly using this as a political football and for political scaremongering. It's absolutely disgraceful.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000187">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire:</by>  They are not spending taxpayers' money on false advertising.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000188">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Absolutely disgraceful.</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000189">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000190">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order, the Hon. Mr Brokenshire!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000191">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Those moneys go to training providers.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000192">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Do not respond to interjections.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000193">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  It's public money.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000194">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Speak through the Chair.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000195">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Taxpayers' money goes to training providers. It provides training.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000196">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Can the honourable minister speak through the Chair, please. Just ignore the Hon. Mr Brokenshire.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="766" />
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000197">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  The federal government has unilaterally made a decision to breach its part of the agreement. South Australia has fully complied. We continue to fully comply. We fully comply, and we continue to fully comply. The federal government has indicated that they are willing to breach their part in the national partnership agreement, and it's not the first time.</text>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000198">No-one can trust them. They change the rules midway through, and they are prepared to do this for a bit of political grandstanding at the expense of the industry. These public moneys go into training. That's where they go—into training. Now the federal government are going to breach their part in the national—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000199">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire:</by>  No, they're not.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000200">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  They are. They are indeed. South Australia continues to comply. The federal government are going to breach that agreement and make our training sector suffer. Shame on them!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20150602ff87f79465de42d0a0000201">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  A supplementary from the Hon. Mr Wade.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>