<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-05-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="609" />
  <endPage num="643" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <page num="611" />
      <text id="20150507f90dfc9187e1445b90000042">
        <heading>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-07">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-07T14:25:20" />
        <text id="20150507f90dfc9187e1445b90000043">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-07T14:25:20" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:25):</by>  I am not sure that answer bore a lot of resemblance to the question, but is the minister saying that there has been no action on the 23 gigalitres that I asked him about 12 months ago?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-05-07">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-05-07T14:25:32" />
        <text id="20150507f90dfc9187e1445b90000044">
          <timeStamp time="2015-05-07T14:25:32" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Climate Change) (14:25):</by>  Not at all, as the honourable member probably knows. These sustainable diversion limits will be agreed by the states and the commonwealth in 2015-16, or June 2016, but the problem is, as I try to tell her, that the federal government is trying to undermine that process by capping the amount of water that is put back into the system, by capping the amount of water that they will buy back.</text>
        <text id="20150507f90dfc9187e1445b90000045">If they bring down, to bridge the gap to 2,750, engineering solutions which are designed to bridge the gap from the 450, then the 450 will not be delivered. The 450 which has been legislated, budgeted for, sitting there in consolidated revenue, waiting to be delivered for engineering projects and on-farm efficiencies, won't be delivered because they are drawing it down to bridge the gap to 2,750. Then they will come to us and say, 'I'm sorry, there's no more that we can do to get you that 450. South Australia won't have the 3,200 gigalitres as promised returned to the river.'</text>
        <text id="20150507f90dfc9187e1445b90000046">There is one fail-safe in all of this, in that in agreeing SDLs next year every state must agree to the whole package, and if South Australia does not get what was promised in the Murray-Darling Basin agreement, South Australia will not be agreeing to those packages.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>