<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-03-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="279" />
  <endPage num="306" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Stamp Duties (Off-The-Plan Apartments) Amendment Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="s3726">
          <name>Stamp Duties (Off-The-Plan Apartments) Amendment Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000310">
        <heading>Stamp Duties (Off-the-plan Apartments) Amendment Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000311">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000312">In committee.</text>
        <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000313">Clause 1.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3404">
          <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000314">
            <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  The purpose of this bill is to extend the current stamp duty exemption that is provided when an apartment in the CBD or outskirts is purchased off the plan. I understand the rationale behind this is partly to increase the population in and around the city as well as stimulating the building industry and encouraging developers to Adelaide. Whilst I do not oppose this bill, I will put on the record that I believe it would be more useful if the government were to consider the benefit of extending a stamp duty exemption for all new houses and land packages regardless of their location in South Australia, provided they have the same value qualifications as the current subject departments.</text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000315">The building industry is one of the largest employers in the state, and each new house provides a multiplier effect of 14 times in the economy. In a recent news article in <term>The Advertiser </term>it was reported that the resale return on apartments, especially those in high-rise complexes, was much higher than the resale return on houses. To demonstrate this, I provided details of an apartment which sold off the plan in 1997 for $1.198 million and completed in 2000. The same apartment recently sold for $4 million, a return of 233 per cent over 15 years. However, as the subject apartment was on the waterfront it is expected that the resale value would be higher than normal due to the limited availability of waterfront property. In my opinion this example is misleading as the capital gain achieved is not typical of the market.</text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000316">In comparison, apartments in the CBD and surrounds are readily available. Some would even say that there is a surplus of properties to demand which will result in a much lower resale  return—if there is a profitable return at all. In the past five years there have been 193 apartments which have sold and then resold in Adelaide and North Adelaide. Of these, 68 apartments (or 35.23 per cent) were sold for less than what the owner purchased them for. Using 3 per cent of the sale price to account for conveyancing and sales costs, an additional eight apartment owners suffered a loss from their resale; just over 60 per cent made a profit.</text>
          <page num="300" />
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000317">The figures show that growth in apartment sales is not as robust as some may expect and, therefore, may not be as attractive to buyers. For the record, I am simply making the point that all that glitters is not gold, and expanding the stamp duty exemption to other properties would go further to stimulate the building industry and attract investors.</text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000318">Clause passed.</text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000319">Clauses 2 to 5 and title passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000320">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
          <startTime time="2015-03-17T16:57:50" />
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000321">
            <timeStamp time="2015-03-17T16:57:50" />
            <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (16:57):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000322">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20150317be778fb45b7547ceb0000323">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>