<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-02-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="181" />
  <endPage num="229" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Skills for All</name>
      <text id="20150225874719e33bd6407f90000028">
        <heading>Skills for All</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-25">
            <name>Skills for All</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-25T14:23:41" />
        <text id="20150225874719e33bd6407f90000029">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-25T14:23:41" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (14:23):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Given the minister's response, how does she then explain that individual RTOs have been advised in a letter: 'The minister'—that is you—'believes that the bridging units claimed are not compliant with the Skills for All contract'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-25">
            <name>Skills for All</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-25T14:24:03" />
        <text id="20150225874719e33bd6407f90000030">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-25T14:24:03" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:24):</by>  That may well be, but what I am saying to you here today is I don't have that detail with me. It is most important, in the rigours of this place, that I bring accurate and detailed information. I don't have that level of detail with me, so I am going to take the whole question on notice and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>