<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2015-02-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="39" />
  <endPage num="91" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Parliamentary Reform</name>
      <text id="20150211e8e43620ce714be080000231">
        <heading>Parliamentary Reform</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4364" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.L. VINCENT</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-11">
            <name>Parliamentary Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-11T15:22:00" />
        <text id="20150211e8e43620ce714be080000232">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-11T15:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4364">The Hon. K.L. VINCENT (15:22):</by>  Given that the minister seems pretty well convinced that the best way to get information out of ministers in this place is not in the chamber itself but through their officers, is she perhaps suggesting that we abolish question time altogether?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-02-11">
            <name>Parliamentary Reform</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-02-11T15:22:16" />
        <text id="20150211e8e43620ce714be080000233">
          <timeStamp time="2015-02-11T15:22:16" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:22):</by>  I am quite astounded at the member's response. I did not say that the only way that members could receive information was through briefings. That is an absolute nonsense and quite a disingenuous representation of my response, which was in fact incredibly genuine.</text>
        <text id="20150211e8e43620ce714be080000234">If the honourable member wants to play word games and misconstrue my answers, then she is simply wasting the time of this chamber. She is wasting my time. If she wants to have a genuine discussion and debate about considering options, I have outlined to the member how we might proceed, but I think misconstruing the responses that I give and the information I give is a most disingenuous way to get off in relation to any considerations of further reform.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>