<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-11-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1659" />
  <endPage num="1693" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Parliament, Proroguing</name>
      <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000286">
        <heading>Parliament, Proroguing</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-11-18">
            <name>Parliament, Proroguing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-11-18T15:26:37" />
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000287">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-18T15:26:37" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:26):</by>  My questions are to the Leader of the Government about the cost of proroguing parliament:</text>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000288">1.&amp;#x9;What is the cost of proroguing parliament, after just seven months of sitting?</text>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000289">2.&amp;#x9;What is the cost of the opening ceremony, including the opportunity cost of judges, service personnel and others who are diverted from their normal duties?</text>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000290">3.&amp;#x9;Has the government calculated the cost in time and wasted resources in members having to reintroduce and redebate bills and motions that will lapse when parliament is prorogued, or the cost of additional printing and circulation of new versions of old bills?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000291">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire:</by>  'No Proroguing'—I'm going to protest.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000292">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-11-18T15:27:26" />
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000293">
          <timeStamp time="2014-11-18T15:27:26" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:27):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions. I note the interjections by the Hon. Robert Brokenshire, saying things like how silly it is to prorogue and yet, what a hypocrite he is—what a total hypocrite.</text>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000294">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000295">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! The minister has the floor.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000296">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  He was a member of a former Liberal government that on many occasions prorogued. We have already had the Hon. Ian Hunter outline the evidence of the many occasions that a former Liberal government prorogued, far more often than we have. I could invite the Hon. Ian Hunter to relay that information if there is any doubt whatsoever, if there is any challenge—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000297">
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. Brokenshire:</by>  That was in the 1800s.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000298">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  It was not in the 1800s.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000299">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins:</by>  A fair bit of it was.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000300">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  That is just absolute nonsense.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="599" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000301">
          <by role="member" id="599">The Hon. J.S.L. Dawkins:</by>  You mean started in the 1800s?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000302">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000303">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Anyway, I will come back and clarify some of those dates shortly, Mr President. The Hon. Robert Brokenshire is an absolute hypocrite, so I completely reject his interventions which, of course, are out of order anyway, sir. In relation to the cost of proroguing parliament, I do not have those figures in front of me at the moment. But this government is committed to keeping all costs to an absolute minimum, and I can assure members that we will be doing that. Any costs that the honourable member refers to in terms of duplication are saved by the efficiencies gained by being able to clear notice papers which are choked with many—</text>
        <page num="1677" />
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000304">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000305">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! The minister has the floor.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201411183c44700b76124fc6b0000306">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  —really quite nonsense motions that members have no intention of ever proceeding with—none at all. This is an ideal opportunity to rid ourselves of those, so there are efficiencies to be gained.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>