<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-09-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1069" />
  <endPage num="1108" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Employment Figures</name>
      <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000182">
        <heading>Employment Figures</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-25">
            <name>Employment Figures</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-25T15:09:58" />
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000183">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-25T15:09:58" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:09):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation prior to directing a question to the Leader of the Government on the issue of the government's promise for an extra 100,000 jobs.</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000184">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000185">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  Prior to the 2010 election, the Labor government promised 100,000 new jobs in South Australia in the period between 2010 and 2016. In the confidential briefing notes leaked by someone very close to minister Gago on this particular issue, the following paragraph has been deleted:</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000186">
          <inserted>While economic conditions at the state and national level mean it will not now be achieved in the time frame outlined in 2010, the government is no less committed to improving employment outcomes.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000187">That was deleted from the old briefing note and replaced with the following, with the minister advised to say:</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000188">
          <inserted>The target was intended to be aspirational and challenging, and the government remains committed to improving employment outcomes.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000189">So no commitment to the 100,000 new jobs, but '…remains committed to improving the employment outcomes'. The minister is also advised in a separate section which says that if the minister is asked about '…whether we will make the 2010 argument'—the minister is told to say—'…the 2010 election commitment to create an additional 100,000 new jobs over six years was made in a completely different economic environment to the one South Australia now finds itself in.' My questions to the minister are as follows:</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000190">1.&amp;#x9;Does the minister now concede that this promise that she and the government made of the 100,000 new jobs will not be achieved?</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000191">2.&amp;#x9;Did the minister, or a member of the minister's staff, direct that her parliamentary briefing note delete the section which indicates that that promise will no longer be achieved in the time frame?</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000192">3.&amp;#x9;Will the minister now indicate what advice she has received as to how many jobs will be achieved in the six-year time frame if it won't be the 100,000 jobs that she and her cabinet ministers promised?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-09-25T15:12:18" />
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000193">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-25T15:12:18" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:12):</by>  Where has the Hon. Rob Lucas been? I have put on the record in quite a detailed way in the past that, although this government remains committed to that 100,000 job target, it is highly unlikely that we are in a position to achieve it. I put that on the record many months ago—I think it was in the first week or so of receiving these new portfolio responsibilities.</text>
        <page num="1081" />
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000194">Where has he been? I have already put all of that on the record. I have already indicated that it is an aspirational target. The economy has changed significantly from the time that we set that target and, although that is very disappointing for us, and we continue to remain committed to it even though it is highly unlikely we are going to achieve it, nevertheless we strive hard to create jobs here in South Australia and to have a significant program.</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000195">I am just not too sure where he has been, and I have outlined our job commitments here in this place so many times before. I have talked here today alone just on our Skills for All training programs. We have the state government's investment of $177 million in our skills training program, which includes our jobs plan, $63 million for our skills training, $44 million for the resources and energy sector and $10 million for the regional jobs accelerator fund. </text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000196">We have those investments in place, and we have a jobs and skills policy which is about bringing forward local council infrastructure and partnering with local employers to identify job opportunities. We also have intensive case-managing support for hundreds and hundreds of South Australian families, priority accessing for training for people who are unemployed and support for workers in areas identified for transition.</text>
        <text id="201409251163951bc1a246eb80000197">Also, in relation to Our Jobs Plan I have spent quite a bit of time outlining in detail our response to the closure of Holden Australia and a number of initiatives we have there. I have also outlined the work we do to stimulate business. We have reduced payroll tax, we are reforming WorkCover and we have put in place a number of initiatives to help streamline large projects so that they are case managed in a way that they can be implemented more quickly. So, we remain committed to our 100,000 job target. We know, as I put on the record many months ago, that it is highly unlikely that we will achieve it. Nevertheless, we remain committed, and I have just outlined the commitments we have in place that are well under way.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>