<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="947" />
  <endPage num="986" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Boards and Committees</name>
      <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000217">
        <heading>Government Boards and Committees</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-23">
            <name>Government Boards and Committees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-23T15:21:16" />
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000218">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-23T15:21:16" />
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (15:21):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for the Status of Women questions about the abolition of government boards.</text>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000219">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000220">
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS:</by>  The government recently announced the abolition of 105 boards, including the Equal Opportunity Tribunal, SAMEAC, the Women's Advisory Committee and the Voices of Women Board, which are all under the minister's purview. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <page num="961" />
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000221">1.&amp;#x9;Why were these boards suddenly considered to be unnecessary or redundant after so many years?</text>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000222">2.&amp;#x9;Is the minister happy with the abolition of the equal opportunity board?</text>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000223">3.&amp;#x9;If so, how can she guarantee that women who have been discriminated against have adequate legal recourse?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-09-23T15:21:54" />
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000224">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-23T15:21:54" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:21):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. Indeed, the Equal Opportunity Commission and tribunal actually do not come under the Office for Women. They come under the Attorney-General's portfolio, so he has been in charge of that.</text>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000225">The honourable member, if he had read a bit more widely, would have seen quite clearly that the EO Commissioner's position remains in place and that the Equal Opportunity Tribunal is proposed to move into SACAT when it is up and running. I think the EO Tribunal is being considered in the second phase. My understanding is that pretty much the status quo will remain in place until our new Civil and Administrative Tribunal is ready to have those roles and functions conferred on it.</text>
        <text id="20140923bd2632f209674f1da0000226">I can absolutely reassure honourable members that the role and function of the Equal Opportunity Commissioner and also the role of the Equal Opportunity Tribunal will remain in place and, even with the changes in relation to SACAT, the role and function and protections afforded to members of the public in relation to equal opportunity matters will still be available. They will be just administered from a different jurisdiction.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>