<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-09-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="869" />
  <endPage num="916" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Animal Welfare</name>
      <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000146">
        <heading>Animal Welfare</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-17">
            <name>Animal Welfare</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-17T15:02:23" />
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000147">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-17T15:02:23" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (15:02):</by>  Supplementary question: in relation to bringing the community along with him, will the minister commit to coming to the marine parks rally tomorrow morning?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-09-17">
            <name>Animal Welfare</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-09-17T15:02:33" />
        <page num="879" />
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000148">
          <timeStamp time="2014-09-17T15:02:33" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (15:02):</by>  This stunt being organised by the Liberal Party—I've got to say, it is very attractive to me to come along and tell the facts, but of course the Liberals do not believe in facts, and they certainly do not believe in science.</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000149">As I said before in this place, when they are confronted with evidence and new information, they turn a blind eye to it. They do not want to know about science and scientific information, marine park innovation and biodiversity studies; they do not want to know about it, Mr President. I have got to say, they have people just like them who are stuck in their ways, who are not open to scientific information, and those people—</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000150">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000151">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  The Hon. Michelle Lensink might be turning out, but I can say, Mr President, if you look at—and I think I have it here today. In fact, a leaflet was put out on the steps or Parliament House just today. I think it was talking about a recent survey into—here we are:</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000152">
          <inserted>…Majority of South Australians Support marine Sanctuaries…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000153">
          <inserted>QUESTION 1</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000154">
          <inserted>Marine sanctuaries are parts set aside within marine parks to protect marine life and ecosystems. Sanctuaries don't allow fishing or mining but do allow recreational pursuits such as swimming, diving, surfing and boating. Do you think marine sanctuaries are a good idea or a bad idea?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000155">
          <inserted>Good idea: 75%</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000156">Seventy-five per cent percent of respondents, and of that is 66 per cent of fishers. People who fish think they are a good idea.</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000157">
          <inserted>QUESTION 2</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000158">
          <inserted>The South Australian Government plans to establish sanctuary areas inside the state's 19 existing marine parks. These sanctuary areas would cover up to 6 per cent of South Australia's waters. Do you support or oppose these marine sanctuaries?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000159">Sixty-eight respondents support, and of that, 57 per cent are fishers. They support sanctuaries and marine parks. Fifty-seven per cent of fishers support sanctuaries.</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000160">
          <inserted>QUESTION 3</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000161">
          <inserted>Do you think covering six per cent of South Australia's waters with marine sanctuaries is about right, too much or too little?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000162">Forty per cent said about right; 24 per cent said too little. So, where are all these people in the consultation the Hon. Michelle Lensink is supposed to have had? They certainly haven't been listened to by the Liberal Party in this state.</text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000163">
          <inserted>QUESTION 4</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000164">
          <inserted>There is a proposal to reduce the amount of area protected in marine sanctuaries. Would you agree or disagree with reducing the area covered from 6 per cent to 4 per cent of South Australia's waters?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2014091713b7b27380764e6ba0000165">Twenty-nine per cent agreed with reducing the area; 57 per cent disagreed. So, all of the people in South Australia—clearly, by this poll, a large majority—-are not the ones being listened to by the Liberal Party; they are not the ones being consulted by the Liberal Party in this state. Why are we not surprised by that?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>