<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-08-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="633" />
  <endPage num="671" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
      <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000644">
        <heading>Departmental Expenditure</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-29" qonNum="125">
            <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000645">
          <inserted>125 <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS </by>(29 November 2012).  (Fifty-Second parliament, Second Session).  Can the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries advise—</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000646">What was the actual level for 2011-12 of both capital and recurrent expenditure underspending (or overspending) for all departments and agencies (which are. classified in the general government sector) then reporting to the Premier?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-29" qonNum="125">
            <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000647">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers):</by>  The Premier has advised:</text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000648">The following levels of capital and recurrent budget expenditure variations for 2011-12 were:</text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000649">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$3.233 million lower than budgeted recurrent expenditure for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. This variation primarily reflects lower employee costs due to vacancies and approved carryovers from 2011-12 into future years mainly associated with the Shared Services SA implementation and Carnegie Mellon University.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000650">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$72.776 million higher than budgeted recurrent expenditure for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet Administered Items. This variation mainly reflects collections by Service SA on behalf of other agencies, including SAPOL expiations, Land Services fees and third-party insurance.</item>
        </text>
        <page num="671" />
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000651">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$0.221 million higher than budgeted recurrent expenditure for the State Governor's Establishment. This variation mainly reflects higher than budgeted movements in employee related provisions and a classification adjustment between operating expenditure and investing consistent with Australian Accounting Standards.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000652">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$0.131 million lower than budgeted capital payments for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. This variation mainly reflects minor delays.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000653">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$0.947 million lower than budgeted capital expenditure for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet Administered Items. This variation mainly reflects delays associated with the construction of police stations on the APY lands.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="201408054c1a622bc4da4f8f90000654">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$0.041 million lower than budgeted capital payments for the State Governor's Establishment reflecting a classification adjustment between operating expenditure and investing consistent with Australian Accounting Standards.</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>