<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-07-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="575" />
  <endPage num="604" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
      <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000043">
        <heading>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-03">
            <name>Site Contamination, Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:26:48" />
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000044">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:26:48" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:26):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation before asking the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation a question about the Clovelly Park contamination.</text>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000045">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000046">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  The opposition has been advised that the State Emergency Management Committee met on Thursday last week (26 June 2014) at one day's notice to discuss issues of escalated air contamination at Clovelly Park. The role of the committee, according to statute, is to provide advice on the management of emergencies in South Australia. The statute gives it no role in managing events that are not emergencies. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000047">1.&amp;#x9;Why did the minister not mention the meeting of the State Emergency Management Committee in his ministerial statement? </text>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000048">2.&amp;#x9;Why is escalated air contamination at Clovelly Park so serious that the State Emergency Management Committee was convened at one day's notice but is not so serious that the residents can wait for a public relations plan to be developed before they are advised?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-07-03T14:27:57" />
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000049">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-03T14:27:57" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:27):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important question. Once again, I have to say that the concerns for the residents came first with me. That is always—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. Wade</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000050">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. Wade:</by>  What about informing this house?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000051">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Wade, allow the minister to complete his answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407030ac2edac35e041bca0000052">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  The Hon. Mr Wade believes that I should have informed the house first. I differ from him on that. My view is and always will be that I should inform the directly affected residents first. They deserve to hear from government agencies first before I advise anyone else more broadly.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>