<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-07-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="497" />
  <endPage num="526" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics</name>
      <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000214">
        <heading>Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-07-01">
            <name>Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-07-01T14:36:33" />
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000215">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-01T14:36:33" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:36):</by>  Supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000216">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Ridgway.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000217">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  Given the cuts that the minister has outlined, can she explain to the people of South Australia why it is a sound investment to invest $2 million a year into the member for Waite to be minister, yet take $1½ million a year away from the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics which is in the electorate of Waite—so you have a very clear choice.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-07-01T14:36:56" />
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000218">
          <timeStamp time="2014-07-01T14:36:56" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:36):</by>  I would challenge the opposition in light of this very hypocritical concern for science and research. I would like to see what the Liberal opposition has done in approaching their federal colleagues to overturn these dreadful cuts to our science and research budget, including the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation.</text>
        <page num="503" />
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000219">The commonwealth has cut $27.6 million from ANSTO's budget and also to the research and development (R&amp;D) tax incentive program. The commonwealth will reduce the amount of assistance available to industry under this program by 1.5 percentage points. This will have a particularly harsh effect on small to medium enterprises, which of course we know make up the bulk of South Australia's economy, and comes at a time when Australia needs to obviously boost its expenditure, not slash and burn.</text>
        <text id="201407019e5b37c8dec5497880000220">So I would challenge members opposite me, if they were really genuine about doing something and if they were really sincere about wanting to do something about science and research, I would like to see telephone calls and I would like to see the correspondence that they have sent off to their federal colleagues urging them to reverse these hideous cuts to our science and research agenda.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>