<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="347" />
  <endPage num="387" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Office for the Public Sector</name>
      <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000185">
        <heading>Office for the Public Sector</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Office for the Public Sector</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T15:12:56" />
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000186">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T15:12:56" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:12):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing a question to the minister representing the Minister for the Public Sector on the subject of public sector appointments.</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000187">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000188">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  A whistleblower has advised the Liberal Party that, on 7 April of this year, minister Close took a cabinet submission to cabinet, which, amongst other things, says words to the effect that she intended to recommend to the Governor at a subsequent date that Ms Erma Ranieri be appointed the Commissioner for Public Employment. On 6 May, almost a month later, minister Close was asked a question in the following terms:</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000189">
          <inserted>Can the minister assure the house that when the current Commissioner for Public Employment concludes his term she will ensure the position is publicly advertised and that there is an open and merit-based appointment process for the new position.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000190">The minister responded, and I quote:</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000191">
          <inserted>I am yet to turn my mind to such an eventuality and will take the question on board.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000192">Subsequent to those questions being asked on 6 May, I am advised that the electronic cabinet online site (known as ECO), whilst it continued to note that cabinet submission 102, minister Close's submission, that the recommendations in that had been approved, the actual submission 102 has been removed from ECO. I am advised that it was removed because there were concerns from the government and the minister that, if that submission was leaked, it would confirm that minister Close had misled parliament on 6 May in response to that question.</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000193">This week minister Close advised the house that Ms Erma Ranieri had been confirmed as the chief executive officer of the new Office for the Public Sector, whilst noting that the current commissioner's term of appointment would be concluding in October of this year. I am advised that the Public Sector Act, section 29, indicates that only administrative units in the public sector can have persons appointed as chief executive officers. My questions to the minister are as follows:</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000194">1.&amp;#x9;Was the minister, or her office, involved in any way in removing her cabinet submission 102 dated 7 April 2014 from ECO and, if so, what were the reasons for removing her submission from ECO?</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000195">2.&amp;#x9;Can the minister provide a gazettal date of any proclamation to create this new administrative unit, the Office for the Public Sector, under the Public Sector Act and, if it has not been gazetted, can the minister explain what is the legal basis for her claim that Ms Erma Ranieri has been appointed as the chief executive officer of the administrative unit known as the Office for the Public Sector?</text>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000196">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000197">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Let's listen to the answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers</electorate>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T15:16:37" />
        <page num="360" />
        <text id="201406051c9e4db448a6431a90000198">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T15:16:37" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (15:16):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his questions and I am pleased to refer those questions to minister Close in another place and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>