<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-06-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="347" />
  <endPage num="387" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hanson Bay</name>
      <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000175">
        <heading>Hanson Bay</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Hanson Bay</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T15:08:28" />
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000176">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T15:08:28" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (15:08):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation. Can the minister advise whether his department had valuation advice from the Valuer-General, or a private valuer approved by the Valuer-General, as required by Premier and Cabinet Circular 114, before purchasing 1,680 hectares of land at Hanson Bay adjoining the Flinders Chase National Park and Southern Ocean Lodge for $1.98 million on 10 October 2012?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-05">
            <name>Hanson Bay</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-05T15:09:20" />
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000177">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-05T15:09:20" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (15:09):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions about Hanson Bay and its purchase. One of the primary purposes, of course, of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 is to establish a system of reserves to manage land for conservation purposes. The government released a strategy called 'Conserving Nature 2012-2020: A strategy for establishing a system of protected areas in South Australia', which aims to add land to existing reserves where there are strong conservation outcomes to be achieved.</text>
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000178">In late 2012, the government purchased 1,900 hectares of land, I am advised, at Hanson Bay on Kangaroo Island for $1.8 million. This is, I am also advised, an extraordinary piece of land that sits between two major parks: Flinders Chase National Park and Kelly Hill Conservation Park. This land presents a once in a lifetime opportunity to bridge a gap and to create a continuous coastal conservation corridor for the south-western end of Kangaroo Island. This is a significant and strategic addition to the state's reserves system. It is anticipated that the land will be formally added to the Flinders Chase National Park later this year.</text>
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000179">The purchased land is largely undisturbed intact mallee and coastal heath vegetation, I am advised, that provides habitat for a range of threatened species, including the western whipbird, the rock parrot, the osprey and the white-bellied sea eagle. Its purchase will allow the integrated management of continuous land parcels across a number of parks and reserves, including fire management. It will also provide opportunities for recreation and tourism, supporting business opportunities from small operators through to the adjoining Southern Ocean Lodge at Hanson Bay.</text>
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000180">With regard to some criticism—ill-informed criticism, I might say—about this purchase from March last year claiming, I think incorrectly, that the government purchased the land at a higher price than that which I listed and also claiming that the valuation was substantially less, I can confirm that that information is incorrect. I am speaking, of course, of the member for Davenport, Mr Iain Evans, who issued a media statement on 8 March 2013 claiming that the government purchased the land for almost $2 million and a valuation of only $800,000. Mr Evans, I am advised, has quoted incorrect figures for both the financial value of the land and the sale price.</text>
        <page num="359" />
        <text id="20140605648f0aa2e16f417cb0000181">With regard to the $800,000 valuation, that is likely to be an old value assessed by the Valuer-General, I am advised. The department commissioned an independent valuation of the land in 2008, which valued the land at $1.3 million, is my advice. In 2012, some four years later, DEWNR purchased the land for $1.8 million, not the $1.98 million claimed by the Hon. Mr Evans in the other place. I can also confirm that this purchase was a one-off strategic investment not impacting on funding arrangements for any other environmental program. Given the strategic placement of this parcel of land between two existing parks and the very rare occurrence of such land coming onto the market, it was a strategic purchase for the department and one that I strongly endorse.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>