<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2014-06-04T00:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, First Session (53-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="303" />
  <endPage num="345" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T09:19:29+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Seafood Industry</name>
      <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000078">
        <heading>Seafood Industry</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2014-06-04">
            <name>Seafood Industry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T14:42:58" />
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000079">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T14:42:58" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:42):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the minister representing the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries a question relating to seafood processors in Port Lincoln.</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000080">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000081">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  Seafood processors in Port Lincoln have indicated that they could face financial ruin in some cases under new requirements imposed on them by SA Water in relation to saline waste. It has been alleged that SA Water does not have the capacity to treat saline water at their treatment plants in the area and, as such, have effectively asked the industry to foot the bill for this activity.</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000082">Stephen Moriarty, the chairman of the action group which has been formed to fight this issue, has publicly stated that the new restrictions related to saline discharges and monitoring requirements have gone too far. Under the newly introduced framework, saline discharges have been classed as an unauthorised trade waste. Unfortunately for the industry, best practice for transportation of fish for production involves slurries made up of sea water and ice, thus creating a situation where a processor has an excess of saline to discharge but is not able to do so in order to meet the strict new regulations.</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000083">In order to meet these regulations, businesses have had to purchase costly monitoring equipment which, as it has been reported, is somewhere in the vicinity of $30,000 up to $100,000, once installed, depending on the particular model. This cost burden to business is said to be too high on their part and many smaller operators simply will not be able to survive under these circumstances. Further to that, it has been alleged that the equipment used is, in fact, very unreliable in determining exactly what the reading is in many cases. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000084">1.&amp;#x9;What criteria were used to determine which monitoring systems industry should purchase?</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000085">2.&amp;#x9;What efforts did the government make to ensure that the compliance with regulations would not cause an unscrupulous cost burden on business?</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000086">3.&amp;#x9;What, if any, period was given for compliance before business incurred the punitive costs associated?</text>
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000087">4.&amp;#x9;What capacity does SA Water have to treat saline water at their Port Lincoln plant?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Employment</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Science and Information Economy</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Business Services and Consumers</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2014-06-04T14:45:00" />
        <text id="201406046f73708249da491180000088">
          <timeStamp time="2014-06-04T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Employment, Higher Education and Skills, Minister for Science and Information Economy, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for Business Services and Consumers) (14:45):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions. They are to the Minister for the Environment, rather than the Minister for Agriculture, and I am sure he will respond to that as soon as he can.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>