<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5791" />
  <endPage num="5862" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Service, Fair Work Principles</name>
      <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000575">
        <heading>PUBLIC SERVICE, FAIR WORK PRINCIPLES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>PUBLIC SERVICE, FAIR WORK PRINCIPLES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000576">In reply to <by role="member" id="3489">the Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</by> (1 March 2012).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-26">
            <name>PUBLIC SERVICE, FAIR WORK PRINCIPLES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000577">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations):</by>  The Minister for the Public Sector has been advised:</text>
        <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000578">Section 56 is an important power and it is inherently sound. It is substantively identical to previous powers to require independent medical examination in the <term>Public Sector Management Act; Government Management and Employment Act and Public Service Act 2009</term>. Furthermore, similar powers exist in other public sector legislative schemes (e.g. the Education Regulations).</text>
        <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000579">As a result of concerns being raised about the use of Section 56, the Commissioner for Public Sector Employment has issued a guideline to inform public sector agencies and assist them in their decision making in relation to this issue.</text>
        <text id="201311265848069709b64018a0000580">Where an employee feels aggrieved by a decision to require them to undergo an independent medical examination under section 56, such an employment decision may be reviewed internally by the agency and if necessary, externally reviewed by Public Sector Grievance Review Commission.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>