<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5621" />
  <endPage num="5726" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Development (Regulated Trees) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001222">
        <heading>DEVELOPMENT (REGULATED TREES) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001223">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001224">In committee.</text>
        <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001225">Clause 1.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3130">
          <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001226">
            <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL: </by> Just briefly, members will recall that we took this to a second reading vote on the last private members' day and, whilst it did not have the support of government, the opposition supported the second reading but made no commitment to support the third reading, so I thought I would at least keep it going for another couple of weeks and see whether the opposition changed its mind. I understand that it has not, so I do not propose to have any detailed committee debate, but we are in committee and I urge all honourable members to support the bill, but I do not propose to make any further remarks on it.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3126">
          <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <page num="5718" />
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001227">
            <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD: </by> I will be brief as well, given the hour, but I would like to place on record that Family First will not support the bill. It was originally our bill that passed the chamber that substantially changed the regulated tree legislation, and we are very proud of that change that was made in the law at that time. I think it has freed up the issue surrounding regulated trees and all the restrictions that are placed on them.</text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001228">I can understand what the Hon. Mark Parnell is doing here. There have been some what I would call 'teething problems' with the legislation, but I understand the government has been dealing with those by regulation and through the local government sector, so we are satisfied with the law as it currently stands.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="2742">
          <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001229">
            <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK: </by> The Liberal Party is not satisfied with the law as it currently stands, but we are not convinced that the Hon. Mark Parnell's amendments actually improve it; in fact, in some ways I think some of his proposals might actually make it worse, so we will not support the third reading.</text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001230">Clause passed.</text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001231">Remaining clauses (2 to 5) and title passed.</text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001232">Bill reported without amendment.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001233">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. M. PARNELL</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2013-11-13T22:56:00" />
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001234">
            <timeStamp time="2013-11-13T22:56:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M. PARNELL (22:56):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001235">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20131113d9acd642b1ab4b8fb0001236">Third reading negatived.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>