<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5621" />
  <endPage num="5726" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fruit Fly</name>
      <text id="2013111302c6246566f84463a0000392">
        <heading>FRUIT FLY</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-13">
            <name>FRUIT FLY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-13T14:36:00" />
        <text id="2013111302c6246566f84463a0000393">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-13T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:36):</by>  I have a supplementary question. Could the minister indicate whether any other interstate funding has been contributed—what I am referring to here is other state government funding—in relation to either the capital cost or the recurrent cost of the project?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-13">
            <name>FRUIT FLY</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-13T14:36:00" />
        <page num="5646" />
        <text id="2013111302c6246566f84463a0000394">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-13T14:36:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:36):</by>  Not at this point but, my goodness, we intend to make sure that we approach other jurisdictions. We have spoken already at an officer level with one of our neighbours and those discussions will continue. We believe that other jurisdictions should be encouraged to enter into partnership with this initiative. After all, it has national benefits and so we will be pursuing those negotiations with a great deal of gusto.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>