<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5543" />
  <endPage num="5623" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Solaria</name>
      <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000402">
        <heading>SOLARIA</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-12">
            <name>SOLARIA</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-11-12T15:25:00" />
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000403">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-12T15:25:00" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (15:25):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation prior to directing a question to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation on the issue of the banning of commercial solaria.</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000404">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000405">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  The minister earlier outlined the government's decision and the reasons for it, and I thank him for the references to the supporting documentation for the decision. My questions are about other related aspects. One was his willingness to consult with small business people about the impact of the government's decision.</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000406">In transcripts of television news from last evening, a spokesperson for the industry, Merv Davies, indicated concern in that they had been trying to meet with the minister to at least discuss their particular concerns in relation to the government's policy that was announced in October last year. Minister Hunter, when asked about this last night by Channel 7—as to whether or not he was aware of any industry attempts to lobby him personally or to meet with him—was quoted as saying, 'They've not approached me in recent times.' The industry spokesman went on to say that they had been approaching the minister since May and they claim that two planned meetings with the minister were cancelled subsequent to May. Mr Davies is quoted as saying, 'Basically he's too busy to see us.'</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000407">The second issue relates to the similar decisions taken by governments interstate. I refer to the fact that the Queensland government has decided to pay compensation to small business operators whose businesses will be closed as result of the equivalent decision in that state. I think it is the equivalent of $1,000 per bed. The Western Australian health minister publicly indicated that they were looking at a similar policy decision and will consider the Queensland government decision to provide compensation of $1,000 per bed for businesses that close down. My questions are:</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000408">1.&amp;#x9;Did the minister cancel planned meetings since May with the industry over the proposal and, if so, why?</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000409">2.&amp;#x9;Did the government consider the payment of compensation to small business operators impacted by the policy, such as exists in some other jurisdictions, and, if so, what is the government's position on this issue?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-11-12T15:28:00" />
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000410">
          <timeStamp time="2013-11-12T15:28:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (15:28):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his important questions. May I say, and I repeat what I said on the wireless yesterday in terms of consultation—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822" kind="interjection">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000411">
          <by role="member" id="1822">An honourable member:</by>  Call me old-fashioned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000412">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. Lensink:</by>  How old are you?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000413">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  I'm looking very good for my age, Hon. Michelle Lensink. Thank you very much for that compliment.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000414">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! I understand what you're saying, minister. I still have a wireless.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000415">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  I was on the wireless and I said that the government took the position of a long lead-in time for this ban. I think it was announced on 25 October 2012 by the former minister. We took the view that we would prefer that course of action with a long lead time to allow business to adjust itself to the new business environment.</text>
        <page num="5567" />
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000416">Queensland undertook another plan altogether. They are introducing their ban a year earlier (1 January 2014) and so perhaps that bore on their consideration of paying a small amount of compensation per bed. I cannot speculate on what motivated Queensland but that is probably a sensible decision from its perspective in introducing the legislation much earlier.</text>
        <text id="20131112a2f799cc187d4a48a0000417">In terms of meeting with industry, when they approached my office earlier in the year my understanding is that senior members in my office met with them whilst I was visiting the South-East on other matters. However, the position was that the government was not going to be changing its policy on this matter and they have not contacted me, to the best of my knowledge, since their initial contacts earlier in the year. I stand by my decision, that I mentioned on the wireless, that they have not contacted me for a further meeting in recent times.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>