<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5543" />
  <endPage num="5623" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000171">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Shack Leases</name>
      <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000172">
        <heading>SHACK LEASES</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-12">
            <name>SHACK LEASES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000173">In reply to <by role="member" id="3404">the Hon. J.A. DARLEY</by> (20 September 2012).</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-11-12">
            <name>SHACK LEASES</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000174">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation):</by>  As the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation I have received this advice:</text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000175">1.&amp;#x9;The Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources has changed its process such that valuation reports are provided to the Valuer-General for review when an objection raised by a lessee includes valuation or real estate evidence. In May 2012, seven valuation reports were referred to the Office of the Valuer-General for review. </text>
        <page num="5550" />
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000176">2.&amp;#x9;On 15 May 2012, the following advice was provided during Question Time: </text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000177">
          <item sublevel="2">
            <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;As indicated to the honourable member during our recent meeting, sections 65 and 66 of the <term>Crown Land Management Act 2009</term> do not apply to rents for leases entered into prior to the introduction of the Act.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000178">
          <item sublevel="2">
            <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;Furthermore, as I have previously indicated to the honourable member, lessees will continue to be notified of their rights under the terms and conditions of their leases.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000179">3.&amp;#x9;At the time of the question, 29 objections to rent had been received for crown land leases. These were assessed and all rents were confirmed. There were also 15 objections to rent for leases in national parks. These have been assessed and all rents were confirmed.</text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000180">4.&amp;#x9;As advised on 15 May 2012, the ability for a lessee to object is contained in the lease. Leases provide for a lessee to advise the minister, within one month of receiving a rent revaluation, that they wish the rent to be reconsidered. The lease then provides that minister shall reconsider the rent and advise the lessee of the decision. Lessees may provide any information that would support their objection that the rent set may be incorrect.</text>
        <text id="20131112d2be29e234c1465aa0000181">5.&amp;#x9;Where the lessee has not provided any supporting evidence for consideration, the review takes into consideration the process undertaken to establish the rent.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>