<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-11-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5543" />
  <endPage num="5623" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
      <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000091">
        <heading>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-29" qonNum="136">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000092">136 <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (29 November 2012).  Can the Minister for Communities and Social Inclusion advise—</text>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000093">What was the actual level for 2011-12 of both capital and recurrent expenditure underspending (or overspending) for all departments and agencies (which are. classified in the general government sector) then reporting to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-29" qonNum="136">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000094">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation):</by>  As the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation I have received this advice:</text>
        <page num="5547" />
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000095">For the former Department for Water, the actual level for 2011-2012 of capital underspending was $2.959 million (with a total of $2.127 million being carried over into the 2012-13 period). The actual level for 2011-12 of recurrent (operating) expenditure underspend was $41.695 million, with a total of $16.237 million being carried over into the 2012-13 period and approximately $25.100 million relating to revenue not received.</text>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000096">For the former Department for Environment and Natural Resources, the actual level for 2011-12 of capital underspending was $331,000 (with a $654,000 pull forward from 2012-13 relating to timing of on various major projects in the 2011-12 financial year). The actual level of recurrent (operating) expenditure underspending was $6.761 million (with a total of $3.020 million being carried over into the 2012-13 period).</text>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000097">For the Environment Protection Authority, the actual level for 2011-12 of capital expenditure classified was $939,000 underspending. The actual level for 2011-12 of recurrent expenditure overspending was $4.1 million.</text>
        <text id="20131112c7ae33a41bcd4a26a0000098">For Zero Waste SA, the actual level for 2011-12 of both capital and recurrent expenditure underspending (or overspending) was $971,000.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>