<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5149" />
  <endPage num="5205" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Departmental Expenditure</name>
      <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000026">
        <heading>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-30" qonNum="47">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000027">47 <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (30 June 2010) (First Session).  What was the actual level for 2009-10 of both capital and recurrent expenditure underspending (or overspending) for all departments and agencies (which are classified in the general government sector) then reporting to the Premier?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2010-06-30" qonNum="47">
            <name>DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000028">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations):</by>  I have been advised of the following:</text>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000029">Agencies reporting to the Premier reported the following levels of capital and recurrent budget expenditure variations for 2009-10:</text>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000030">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$4.731 million lower than budget recurrent expenditure for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. This variation mainly reflects vacancies and lower than anticipated medical panel referrals.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000031">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$3.362 million lower than budget recurrent expenditure for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet Administered Items. This variation mainly reflects changes in the timing of the construction of police stations and staff accommodation on the APY lands and a net benefit from a lower than expected Government Workers Rehabilitation Compensation liability at 30 June 2010.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000032">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$0.033 million higher than budget recurrent expenditure for the State Governor's establishment. This variation is offset by lower than budget capital payments of $0.042 million.</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20131015f27447cea01b4dc3a0000033">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">$1.062 million lower than budget capital payments for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet. This variation mainly reflects delays associated with World Park One and the Dunstan Playhouse refurbishment.</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>