<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-09-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5091" />
  <endPage num="5151" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray River Shacks</name>
      <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000424">
        <heading>MURRAY RIVER SHACKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-09-26">
            <name>MURRAY RIVER SHACKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-09-26T14:32:00" />
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000425">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-26T14:32:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (14:32):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Water and the River Murray a question relating to shack sites.</text>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000426">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000427">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE:</by>  In answer to a question from me yesterday, the minister asserted that the issue of illegal development and environmental compliance in the Mid Murray region is not one for government as the shacks are not on crown land. I am advised that there is a range of unlawful developments which raise issues of environmental compliance which are within the minister's areas of responsibility. The Mid Murray Council is confronted with work occurring on crown land, including reserved areas, and on the banks of the River Murray.</text>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000428">River compliance issues include the construction of river structures, such as jetties, landings, houseboat moorings, riverbank modification and so on, as well as the placement of fill or sand to replenish river beaches and recreation areas. I understand that all these areas would ordinarily be of interest and involve the EPA, crown lands and the department.</text>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000429">Yesterday, the minister asserted the department is not aware of any direct requests from the Mid Murray Council to increase inspections along the River Murray. I draw the minister's and the department's attention to page 13 of a series of letters to ministers dated 22 May 2008, including the then minister for the River Murray, in which the council highlighted the limits of its own resources and sought additional staffing of both EPA and DWLBC. My question is: will the minister ensure that his agencies engage the Mid Murray Council to ensure that resources are being deployed effectively to meet the complementary responsibilities of both tiers of government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Sustainability</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Water and the River Murray</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-09-26T14:33:00" />
        <page num="5114" />
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000430">
          <timeStamp time="2013-09-26T14:33:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:33):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his second question on this topic this week. If I didn't make it perfectly plain yesterday, I will try to make it perfectly plain today.</text>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000431">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="16">The Hon. G.E. Gago interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000432">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  Well, I could, but I won't take up the chamber's time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. Wade</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000433">
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. Wade:</by>  You denied responsibility yesterday, so that might be a good start.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201309269b02b7bd910e4537a0000434">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER:</by>  The honourable member seems to have made up his own mind about what the answer is going to be. I'm not sure if I can assist him any further, but let me say this. It is the council's responsibility—the council's responsibility—to deal with development on privately held freehold land. Where the council approaches my department for assistance, in terms of crown lands or illegal developments that go against any acts that I have to administer, I have said my department is very happy to engage with local government, and it will do so.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>