<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4207" />
  <endPage num="4256" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Road Traffic (Emergency Vehicles) Amendment Bill</name>
      <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000591">
        <heading>ROAD TRAFFIC (EMERGENCY VEHICLES) AMENDMENT BILL</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Second Reading</name>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000592">
          <heading>Second Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000593">Adjourned debate on second reading.</text>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000594">(Continued from 20 March 2013.)</text>
        <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2013-06-19T17:55:00" />
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000595">
            <timeStamp time="2013-06-19T17:55:00" />
            <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (17:55):</by>  The government intends to support the amended bill. Indeed, during the 2010 election the government announced a proposal similar to the one we discussed today so as to ensure that when passing emergency services vehicles attending a call, other vehicles would reduce their speeds from 40 to 25 km/h.</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000596">Underpinning this approach was advice from the University of Adelaide Centre for Automotive Safety Research which showed that, while the risk of fatal injury to a pedestrian by a passing vehicle at 25 km/h is 0.95 per cent, the risk rises to 3.56 per cent if the vehicle is travelling at 40 km/h. We would agree that is a significant difference.</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000597">The government encountered considerable support as to the general tenor of the provisions from other key stakeholders, including the SES, the United Firefighters Union, the Ambulance association, the SES Volunteers' Association and the CFS volunteers, but acknowledged SAPOL's responsible reservations regarding their enforcement.</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000598">Given the need for all agencies involved to have access to an appropriate forum for comment on the matter, the establishment of a select committee was agreed. The government agrees with the select committee that the research data provides a compelling argument for a preventative approach to road safety for emergency service workers; however, there still remains some concern on our part about the proposed penalties in the revised bill.</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000599">Consequently, I take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the member for Stuart's willingness to accept the government's suggestion that penalties should align with those applied to general speeding. I want to thank all members for their outstanding work on the select committee. Their bipartisan approach to road safety has been much appreciated and the spirit of all concerned in working through these issues in the interests of enhanced road safety demonstrates a shared willingness to deliver good results for all emergency services and the community generally. I commend the bill.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2013-06-19T17:57:00" />
          <page num="4252" />
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000600">
            <timeStamp time="2013-06-19T17:57:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (17:57):</by>  I would like to thank the Hon. Russell Wortley for his well considered words and indication of support from the government for this really quite sensible bill. I have had a number of discussions with other crossbench members and I have been pleased to see that there does not seem to be any concerns at this particular point. With that, I commend the speedy passage of the bill.</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000601">Bill read a second time.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000602">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000603">Bill taken through committee without amendment.</text>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000604">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2013-06-19T17:59:00" />
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000605">
            <timeStamp time="2013-06-19T17:59:00" />
            <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (17:59):</by>  I move:</text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000606">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="20130619a2473d1cb705444e90000607">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>