<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-05-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3903" />
  <endPage num="3981" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Arsenic Contamination</name>
      <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000568">
        <heading>ARSENIC CONTAMINATION</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-15">
            <name>ARSENIC CONTAMINATION</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-15T14:27:00" />
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000569">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-15T14:27:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (14:27):</by>  I seek leave to make an explanation before directing a question to the Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation regarding arsenic contamination at the Goodwood worksite for the Seaford and Belair rail corridor.</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000570">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="3939" />
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000571">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  For months, local residents in Goodwood have been concerned about the harmful nature of dust landing on their homes, vehicles and window seals as a result of the removal and transportation of soil at the Goodwood railway worksite. Despite these concerns, knowledge of any contamination of soil has been denied.</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000572">On 30 January, the <term>Eastern Courier Messenger</term> reported that SA Health authorities have declared that the level of arsenic in the soil at the Goodwood railway worksite posed no threat to residents. However, a document entitled 'Goodwood grade separation—soil contamination assessment', of 27 July 2012, which was obtained through freedom of information, revealed that very high levels of arsenic were detected in samples taken from bore logs—levels of 910 milligrams per kilogram. It has been reported that this soil was transported through the local area in uncovered trucks. My questions for the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000573">1.&amp;#x9;Is the minister aware of this issue?</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000574">2.&amp;#x9;When were the EPA and/or Health advised of carcinogens found in the rail corridor?</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000575">3.&amp;#x9;What preventative actions were taken to ensure the soil was removed and disposed of safely?</text>
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000576">4.&amp;#x9;Did the minister or any of his agencies advise residents of possible risks during the process?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <startTime time="2013-05-15T14:29:00" />
        <text id="20130515cdc044ffec1d483d80000577">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-15T14:29:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (14:29):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her most important and intriguing question. It does go to a multiagency approach, I would imagine, including my own agency and perhaps the EPA, Health and the Department of Transport, so I will undertake to take the question on notice and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>