<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3781" />
  <endPage num="3832" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Marine Parks</name>
      <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000040">
        <heading>MARINE PARKS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Leader of the Opposition</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-01">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-01T14:31:00" />
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000041">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-01T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Leader of the Opposition) (14:31):</by>  A further supplementary question: if PIRSA staff and officials are best placed to deal with the voluntary buyback because of their close relationship and understanding of the industry, why then aren't they also the best people to handle the compulsory compensation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-05-01">
            <name>MARINE PARKS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-05-01T14:31:00" />
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000042">
          <timeStamp time="2013-05-01T14:31:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:31):</by>  It has also come to my attention that meetings with each sector have been occurring in April, and a draft reduction plan was put out in March. That is the further advice that I have received. So—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000043">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  This has not been updated since 2011; that's your problem.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000044">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  The dialogue continues, discussions continue; it is a moving feast. In relation to the compulsory acquisition, it has been determined that DEWNR is best placed, it is more consistent with their policy area—</text>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000045">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="17">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000046">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  Ah yes, it is the Marine Parks Act. That is why the Minister for Environment would have carriage of compulsory acquisition. It has a clause stating that the Minister for Environment is responsible for the compulsory buyback component. But, I can assure all honourable members that it does not matter which minister has carriage of which component; we are both incredibly competent ministers, we have very good agencies and very competent—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. Hunter</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000047">
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. Hunter:</by>  We work closely together.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000048">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  We do work very closely together. We are at one—we are at one with these matters. We are able to balance the environmental values and issues with commercial fishing activities, and I think we do that extremely well. Both of our agencies are full of incredibly hardworking and competent people, and I will absolutely—</text>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000049">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="52">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="3784" />
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000050">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO:</by>  I can absolutely assure you that both components will be done extremely well. As I have already indicated in this place, the advice is that we will not be requiring to go down the path of compulsory acquisition. All the advice—even if you talk to the industry, which obviously the Hon. David Ridgway does not bother to do, but if he did discuss it with the industry, the industry is also saying that it is very unlikely that compulsory acquisition would be needed because there is enough interest in the industry.</text>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000051">Of course, not only does the Hon. David Ridgway not bother to listen to information that is exchanged in this place, he does not bother to talk to the industry and have any idea about what is going on out there.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1822">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201305016046e0540e324a0b80000052">
          <by role="member" id="1822">The PRESIDENT:</by>  A further supplementary, Ms Lensink.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>