<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-03-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3439" />
  <endPage num="3474" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000177">
        <heading>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-19">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-19T15:06:00" />
        <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000178">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-19T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (15:06):</by>  A supplementary question: how does the minister respond to comments also published in the paper today from Craig Knowles which described the decision to cut funding from the MDBA as disappointing, completely baffling and strange, and says that it tells upstream states that South Australia cares less and is 'at odds with its two year long "Save the Murray" campaign'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3122" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. I.K. HUNTER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-19">
            <name>MURRAY-DARLING BASIN PLAN</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-19T15:06:00" />
        <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000179">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-19T15:06:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3122">The Hon. I.K. HUNTER (Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation, Minister for Water and the River Murray, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation) (15:06):</by>  I thank the honourable member for the supplementary question because it allows me to say a few extra things and put on the record how this government has been leading the charge in the fight to make a healthy River Murray.</text>
        <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000180">Where was the opposition; where was their position on the River Murray? They wanted us to accept 2,200 gigalitres. They wanted us to take what was on offer from New South Wales and Victoria without going in to fight for our state. That is where the Liberal Party were. They put up the white flag at day one. It was Premier Jay Weatherill who insisted on taking the fight up to the commonwealth and the Eastern States; it was Premier Weatherill who took the fight up and got us 3,200 gigalitres.</text>
        <page num="3450" />
        <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000181">I seem to remember that it was also Mr Craig Knowles who did not want to give us the 3,200 gigalitres either. It was that gentleman who was suggesting that we take a lesser amount. It was Premier Jay Weatherill who got this amount for our state; it is Premier Jay Weatherill who will deliver it for our state. Let me say, we in South Australia take 7 per cent of the water out of our river system—7 per cent. This next coming financial year, with our contribution to the Murray-Darling Basin staying exactly at what it is, we will be paying 29 per cent of the authority's money—29 per cent for 7 per cent take. Is that fair? Is that what you want us to say to New South Wales? 'Don't worry guys in New South Wales, we'll oversubsidise you. We in South Australia will subsidise you for the extra money.'</text>
        <text id="201303192dfe4337378c4aeb80000182">That is the Liberal Party position—we will be subsidising the Eastern States for no return whatsoever. That is not our position. We will fight for our state; we will make sure South Australian irrigators and South Australians enjoy a healthy river.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>