<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-03-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3365" />
  <endPage num="3440" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Stationery Contract</name>
      <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000433">
        <heading>GOVERNMENT STATIONERY CONTRACT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-03-07">
            <name>GOVERNMENT STATIONERY CONTRACT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-03-07T14:45:00" />
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000434">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-07T14:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (14:45):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, representing the Minister for Finance, questions regarding the across government contract for the provision of stationery and related products.</text>
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000435">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000436">
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  Contention has been raised recently with regard to the government's attempt to provide a one-stop shop across government for all stationery products, including toners following the 'tonergate' fiasco. The contract was awarded to two multinational companies. Particularly contentious is the fact that only metropolitan schools were included in the contract. I have been advised by the company previously responsible for supplying all schools with stationery, KW Wholesale Stationers, that non-metropolitan schools were excluded from the contract. I have been further advised that some may consider the exclusion of non-metropolitan schools to be profit skimming as predominately profit is made by supplying the metropolitan schools and that it is virtually non-viable to only supply non-metropolitan schools. My questions are:</text>
        <page num="3392" />
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000437">1.&amp;#x9;Why did the contract exclude non-metropolitan schools from the contract? On whose advice was this done? What was the nature of the advice?</text>
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000438">2.&amp;#x9;Why were other essential school products such as art and craft materials and janitorial supplies also not included in the contract?</text>
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000439">3.&amp;#x9;Was an economic impact study conducted before the tender was awarded? If not, will the minister consider conducting economic impact statements of the effects on local businesses before tenders are awarded in the future?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2013-03-07T14:47:00" />
        <text id="201303072e68dff65d44479380000440">
          <timeStamp time="2013-03-07T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:47):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his most important questions and I will refer them to the Minister for Finance in another place and bring back a response. If I recall, I believe that—and obviously the minister will either confirm this or not—the exclusion of regional schools was at the request of those regional centres that wanted to be excluded because of the local arrangements that they had in place and the convenience around that. But as I said, I am not the minister responsible and I will refer the questions to the appropriate minister and bring back a response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>