<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-03-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3243" />
  <endPage num="3295" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000015">
      <heading>Answers to Questions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Consultants and Contractors</name>
      <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000016">
        <heading>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-07" qonNum="297">
            <name>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000017">297 <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</by> (7 July 2011) (First Session).  For the year 2010-11—</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000018">1.&amp;#x9;Were any persons employed or otherwise engaged as a consultant or contractor, in any department or agency reporting to the minister, who had previously received a separation package from the state government; and</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000019">2.&amp;#x9;If so—</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000020">
          <item sublevel="2">(a)&amp;#x9;What number of persons were employed;</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000021">
          <item sublevel="2">(b)&amp;#x9;What number were engaged as a consultant; and</item>
        </text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000022">
          <item sublevel="2">(c)&amp;#x9;What number engaged as a contractor?</item>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Agriculture</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Forests</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Status of Women</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2011-07-07" qonNum="297">
            <name>CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTORS</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000023">
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations):</by>  I have been advised:</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000024">Primary Industries and Regions SA</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000025">1.&amp;#x9;During 2010-11 Primary Industries and Regions SA did not engage any person as a consultant or contractor who had previously received a separation package.</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000026">2.&amp;#x9;Not applicable.</text>
        <page num="3244" />
        <text continued="true" id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000027">ForestrySA</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000028">1.&amp;#x9;During the year 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011, ForestrySA did not, to the best of their knowledge, engage any consultants or contractors who may have previously received a separation package from the state government.</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000029">2.&amp;#x9;Not applicable.</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000030">South Australian Tourism Commission</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000031">1.&amp;#x9;For the year 2010-11, there were no persons employed or otherwise engaged as a consultant or contractor, appointed by the South Australian Tourism Commission who had previously received a separation package from the state government.</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000032">2.&amp;#x9;Not applicable.</text>
        <text continued="true" id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000033">Office for Women</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000034">1.&amp;#x9;For the year 2010-2011, there were no persons employed or otherwise engaged as a consultant or contractor in the Office for Women who had previously received a separation package from the state government.</text>
        <text id="20130305326fb7da20d74158a0000035">2.&amp;#x9;Not applicable.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>