<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2013-02-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3217" />
  <endPage num="3243" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Agricultural Research and Development</name>
      <page num="3219" />
      <text id="20130221501734981844462bb0000035">
        <heading>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3489" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-21">
            <name>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-21T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20130221501734981844462bb0000036">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-21T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3489">The Hon. R.L. BROKENSHIRE (14:26):</by>  I have a supplementary question based on the minister's answer that SARDI is not going to the University of Adelaide. How will the minister address the impact of that on the budget given that there were savings to be made in the budget for PIRSA?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1821" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. G.E. GAGO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <electorate id="">Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2013-02-21">
            <name>AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2013-02-21T14:26:00" />
        <text id="20130221501734981844462bb0000037">
          <timeStamp time="2013-02-21T14:26:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1821">The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Minister for Forests, Minister for Regional Development, Minister for the Status of Women, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (14:26):</by>  I share the Hon. Robert Brokenshire's disappointment about the amalgamation not proceeding at this point in time. I think that would have been an excellent model but it is not to be at this point in time. We have repositioned ourselves so that we are able to move forward. For me, the most important aspect now is that we position ourselves in a way that enables SARDI to access those additional federal funds. Given that negotiations were not proceeding with the amalgamation, it was important that we looked at other alternate models to enable us to access those very important funds.</text>
        <text id="20130221501734981844462bb0000038">We have landed on a partnership arrangement and I think that is still a very strong position. As I said, it now opens the door for us and enables us to proceed to access additional funds. Who knows what the future will hold? We are always prepared to negotiate and to look at providing the very best model possible for research in this state because we know how important research is to our primary industries.</text>
        <text id="20130221501734981844462bb0000039">In terms of savings, my understanding is that SARDI has been required, as has every other agency, to produce savings. Those savings have been identified and they will have to be delivered. Whether it is a partnership arrangement or an amalgamation arrangement, those savings were still planned for. They are in the forward estimates and they are still the same level of savings that I am aware of, and they will still be required to meet those savings.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>