<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2012-11-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Second Parliament, Second Session (52-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>52</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2647" />
  <endPage num="2693" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Printer Cartridge Scam</name>
      <page num="2659" />
      <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000245">
        <heading>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2012-11-13">
            <name>PRINTER CARTRIDGE SCAM</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2012-11-13T15:10:00" />
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000246">
          <timeStamp time="2012-11-13T15:10:00" />
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS (15:10):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Industrial Relations, representing the Minister for Finance, a question about the new contractual arrangements for government stationery orders.</text>
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000247">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1819" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000248">
          <by role="member" id="1819">The Hon. T.J. STEPHENS:</by>  Recently the government put a freeze on the power of departments and individual offices to negotiate their stationery contracts. Presumably this was a kneejerk reaction to the 'cartridgegate' fiasco a few months ago. Obviously, while something needed to be done, this seems to be a clear case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.</text>
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000249">The individually negotiated contracts often led to better deals being negotiated which were tailored to the specific needs of the office or department. My office has been contacted by a number of local stationers who have lost their contracts, which were offered on a very low margin basis, a situation that was mutually beneficial to the government and South Australian businesses. I have recently learned that Shared Services has directed that all future purchases must be made through two specific multinational suppliers which are based interstate. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000250">1.&amp;#x9;Can the minister explain why individual departments and offices were stripped of their power to negotiate their own stationery contracts to the detriment of departmental budgets and local businesses?</text>
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000251">2.&amp;#x9;How can the government say it supports local business when it has so blatantly harmed them?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State/Local Government Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2012-11-13T15:12:00" />
        <text id="20121113c8b0d8cd4913405eb0000252">
          <timeStamp time="2012-11-13T15:12:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for State/Local Government Relations) (15:12):</by>  I would like to thank the honourable member for his very important questions. I will take them on notice and refer them to the Minister for Finance in another place and get a response as soon as possible.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>